翻訳メモリ使用時の既存訳が新規訳に及ぼす影響
Contents
1. Bowker 2005 Pym Pym 2008 2 2 act TY 24 y2. Baker M 1993 Corpus linguistics and translation studies Implications and applications In M Baker et al Eds Text and technology In honor of John Sinclair Amsterdam John Benjamins 223 250 Baker M 1996 Corpus based translation studies The challenges that lie ahead In J C Sager amp H L Somers Eds Terminology LSP and translation studies in language engineering in honour of Juan C Sager Amsterdam John Benjamins 175 186 Baker M 1998 Norms In M Baker Ed Routledge encyclopedia of translation studies London New York Routledge 163 165 205 No 8 2008 E DY Baker M 2007 Patterns of idiomaticity in translated vs non translated text Belgian journal of linguistics the study of language and translation Vol 21 11 21 Balask M 2008 What does the figure show Patterns of transtionese in a Hungarian comparable corpus trans kom 1 1 58 73 Online http www trans kom eu bd01nr01 trans kom 01 05 Balasko What Does the Figure Show 2008 0707 pdf 2008 7 28 H Blum Kulka S 1986 Shifts of cohes
3. ST 2 Example base machine translation EBMT MAHT Machine aided human translation ST TT Bowker 2004 Quah 2006 ST TT EF TT TT
4. positive transfer Toury ST TT TT gt TT X STTT TT ST TT ST TT TT ST positive transfer 2 8 TT negative transfer TT negative transfer MARX EY TT
5. EBMT 3 Bowker 2005 4 5 No fuzzy
6. Vanderauwera 1985 Baker 1996 1 Gnfinite structure normalization conservatism M Blum Kulka 1986 3 z 2h TIR FREY CT iA Be APT FTA bh BR 1 I do not feel shocked having expected him to take the easiest way out 2 I do not feel shocked because I expect expect him to take the easie
7. the third code Frawley 1984 translationese Toury 1980 1995 Baker 2007 p 12
8. Toury 1995 p 271 FR F FB No 8 2008 2007 A A Gibid B
9. 109 121 2004 2000 ENER a BE MAR IL EERE LD Da Online http homepage3 nifty com hon yaku tsushin ron bn naze html 2008 7 A 15 H H 2007 2 DVV Ya vic bi OM cM RET TROOP AA 37 68 207 No 8 2008 my a 208
10. Bia 2 EY E 7 TT TT translationese ST ST TT ST TT RY gt uk H
11. RAY OFM 4 peephole translation All A scan of the selected application will then begin and the scan window be shown When you 203 No 8 2008 press the Close button the window will close although the scan will continue 4 100 A scan of the
12. 3 1 Pym 1 1 1f equivalence 2004 p 63 3 ST TT E 1 1 OR artificial 1 E Bowker 2002 peephole translation Heyn 1998 p 135 Gt this H cohesion Bowker 2002 p 117
13. ST TT 1 1 TT gt TT peephole translation translationese X4 Tuniversals S universals ae HE O Sentence salad TT Peephole translation TT TT
14. producb aw of translation iw REM E DTS translationese E A E translation universals yes 3 Toury Toury 1995 translationese aw of growing standardization E 2 PURO IE 1aw of interference ST TT target text translated text 3 ST TT
15. ou Jd A positive negative transfer lt BRE ORED TT A p J gt EE TT TT O FH ELT TT LL EPF TT transfer 4 A a 201 4 No 8 2008 1 TT Creating a list of objects to scan TT Changing the type of objects to scan
16. 204 TT TT E YAMADA Masaru yamada apple eye com at 1 Munday 2008 p 182 2 MAHT HAMT Human aided machine translation
17. NR A E 0 OD Pym 2008 transfer KS FAI Hinds OLD JETS HC BRT OCHO GRILLES OR Sentence salad TT CLEC negative AQ HA FEEL Bowker J a 9 H
18. USN 2004 p 45 HED OF JED TRV NZ 3 EL ee A Gutt 2000 SCHR amp MH TT ST TT MRO FICHE SIF SOL SBR BAY C
19. 2 ot detailed information 2 TT TT sn FAI BAUR Re FOR E
20. TT TT TT negative transfer Bowker 2005 lt HER 2 Y TT f 4 sentence salad MT
21. translationese translationese 2 2 1 2 1 2 Ce MS NR TT 2 2 Balask6 corpus driven corpus base corpus driven TT TT
22. 1 T universals S universals 2 Pe translationese TT ST NT TT ST NT 197 No 8 2008 TT ST S universals Tuniversals 4452 TT 6 DTS Klaudy 1996 Skopos
23. B Toury 2 2 2 Toury 2004 Pym 2008 Toury 2 20
24. Chesterman 2004 S universals T universals S universals S source ST T universals T target Chesterman TT ZER 7 A b translated text AHER CRY AR aaa 7 A b amp NT non translated text Gibid S universals ST TT TLuniversals TT NT Toury Chesterman Toury 2 S universals 2004 p 40 Blum Kulka 1986 Blum Kulka ST TT TT NT S universals Toury ST
25. EF LIT Reboot PC SV RI ST TT Vanderauwera 1985 GT TT 1999 39 ST TT
26. ST translationese ST TT 2007 2000 TT ST Bowker 2005 Baker 1993 242 House 1997 covert translation C BalaskG 2008 p 61 overt translation Baker Toury
27. transfer TT she HO R positive transfer negative transfer E formal equivalence TT positive interference negative interference Toury YOO Mana Ly O E A DTS RAR CL BRE REA DHA A B ibid p 278 A BORSA 1
28. TT Balask6 Gibid NT argumenD oe pee ae figure bra O ibid p 60 NT TT fia CX OTT NT Ce Soles Ae 198 TT ST figure ibid p 69 ST
29. 200 coherence Bowker thePC ST ST TT TT aac GEO Sti Ex R
30. F Man EY I4 ST TT ST ST TT 2007 TT ST TT XX2 I ERAS E I WAE UIC F WRAY ST You must click on the button if you want to select the character ST When you are finished selecting the character click the OK button oo OK MB ST First check for disk space on the drive that contains the Temp folder
31. gt 4 Translation universals DTS Baker 1993 p 243 ST TT se rents Toury explicitation spell things out Baker 1993 p 180 J Essi 2 gt 194 that BE simplification 10 Ye UT Gibid p
32. Temp ST Close other programs check for disk space on the drive you are saving to and then save again Bowker 2002 104 199 2 ST you click select button character ST PERRERA TT No 8 2008 youy RR HAY MF OLD if when 3 check for disk space on the drive
33. 2 TT TT TT 1 2 2 3 BE TT To view detailed information click Operation report TT 202 TT When the scan is running detailed information is written to a report 3 TT
34. 1 TT H ST HH 2 SLIT ST TT 1 1 2 d E HAS E ST 2 1 1
35. TT ST NT ST TT TT ST S universals 2 FAL ARR TT NT TT NT OFF ST TT T universal ST TT NT translationese
36. 1 TT TT objects to scan TT 1 TT TT TT TT negative transfer TT 3 2 TT Creating a hst of objects to scan TT Changing the type of objects to scan 1 2 1 ST TT
37. DNR l nt PABLO KR TC A LAL OL DORMRIC TT gt BY vA UCR Al A DTS gt 4 E A F 193 X EY Even Zohar 1978 1990 literary polysystem OFA BA L mi Toury E E TT
38. R CIBEIRA BT UA AR CS Y 2 Translationese zz GF Toury 1995 p 208 Translationese alien ED translationese
39. 2 ST TT 3 MAR OW NT ST NT JED ee 3 ST TT ST Rc man a ST TT Skopos ST Balask6 2008 ene zE TT NT ST
40. JAITS Translated text or so called translationese Toury 1980 1995 contains alien linguistic elements that are less frequently observed in the non translated target text because in the course of translation process both interference from the source text and translation universals i e explicitation etc are involved The influence acted upon the translationese is studied in relation to the source text ST and the non translated target text NT Chesterman 2004 However there is an additional element that affects translation that is translated text itself TT Especially when a Translation Memory tool is used the influence from TT to TT is maximized In this regard issues with a translation memory including sentence salad effect and peephole translation are captured as a result of TT to TT influence or interference 1 A B A B C 2004 p 166 SL TL
41. YAMADA Masaru The influence of existing translation on newly translated segments with the use of a translation memory system Examined in terms of Interference and Translation Universals Interpreting and Translation Studies No 8 2008 pages 191 207 by the Japan Association for Interpreting and Translation Studies PERRERA translationese 3 translation universals Baker 1993 aw of growing No 8 2008 Bl CHHER S IVS mage ELE OC BHO Hak I E LTH 5 standardization Qaw of interference Toury 1995 T AIRE
42. OMAHA LR MRR A EY IIKO Fuzzy 4 peephole translation ST DA TT Esseink 2000 10 DAEGL TSE KE DIC HAR A EY TAT TT 2 65 HHL TT TT negative transfer sentence salad
43. ST corpus base 2 translationese 1 en 196 ST 5 S universals T universals ST TT
44. 2007 al amp 2 foreignization ORAL HAVE Cle literal vs free vs vs domestication Venuti 1995 Toury 1995 DTS descriptive translational studies prescription description 192 translational norms DTS BAR A EY Baker 1998
45. MiA ARA 2000 Do MARK translationese ST nature alien ul a RTO ESIC RIC Lbs wilderness scene EE ae OLB IC i Nida 1964 MORE SCO HGR FA ARSENE SY x HH
46. als In S Tirkkonen Condit ed Empirical research in translation and intercultural studies T bingen Gunter Narr 147 155 Toury G 1980 In search of a theory of translation Tel Aviv The Porter Institute Toury G 1995 Descriptive translation studies and beyond Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins Toury G 2004 Probablistic explanations in translation studies Welcome as they are would they qualify as universals In Mauranen A amp P Kujamaki Eds Translation universals do they exist Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins 15 31 Vanderauwera R 1985 Dutch novels translated into English The transformation of a minority literature Amsterdam Rodopi Venuti L 1995 The translator s invisibility A history of translation London Routledge 1999 Shifts of cohesion and coherence in simultaneous interpretation from English into Japanese 16 Vol 8 No 2 31 41 2007 3 43 2007
47. en Narr Heyn M 1998 Translation memories Insights and prospects In L Bowker M Cronin D Kenny amp J Pearson Eds Unity in diversity Current trends in translation studies Manchester St Jerome 123 36 Klaudy K 1996 Back translation as a tool for detecting explicitation strategies in translation In K Klaudy et al Eds Translation studies in Hungary Budapest Scholastica 99 114 Malmkj r K 1997 Punctuation in Hans Christian Andersen s Stories and in Their Translations into English In F Poyatos ed Nonverbal Communication and Translation New Perspectives and Challenges in Literature Interpretation and the Media Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins 151 162 Muday J 2008 Introducing translation studies London Routledge Nida E 1964 Toward a science of translating Leiden E J Brill Pym A 2004 The moving text Localization translation and distribution Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins Pym A 2008 On Toury s laws of how translators translate In A Pym M Shlesinger et al Eds 206 Beyond descriptive translation studies Amsterdam John Benjamins 317 328 Quah C 2006 Translation and technology New York Palgrave Macmillan Shlesinger M 1991 Interpreter latitude vs due process simultaneous and consecutive interpretation in multilingual tri
48. ion and coherence in translation In J House amp S Blum Kulka Eds Interlingual and intercultural communication T bingen Gunter Narr Verlag 17 35 Blum Kulka S amp Levenston E 1983 Universals of Lexical Simplification In C Faerch amp G Casper Eds Strategies in Inter language Communication London New York Longman 119 139 Bowker L 2002 Computer aided translation technology A practical introduction Ottawa University of Ottawa Press Bowker L 2005 Productivity vs Quality A pilot study on the impact of translation memory systems Localisation Focus 4 1 13 20 Chesterman A 2004 Beyond the particular In Mauranen A amp P Kujamaki Eds Translation universals do they exist Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins 33 49 Esselink B 2000 A practical guide to localization Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins Even Zohar I 1978 1990 The position of translated literature within the literary polysystem In L Venuti Ed The translation studies reader London New York Routledge 192 197 Frawley W 1984 Prolegomenon to a theory of translation In W Frawley Ed Translation Literary linguistics and philosophical perspectives London Toronto Associated University Press 159 175 Gutt E 2000 Translation and relevance Cognition and context Manchester Boston St Jerome House J 1997 Translation Quality Assessment A Model Revisited Tiibig
49. p 180 181 simplify J TTR Type Token Ratio mH AA gt F leveling out Fi Blum Kulka amp Levenston 1983 Vanderauwera 1985 A OO 1991 finite structure 1997 lexical density Malmkj r 1997 Vanderauwera 198 TTR
50. st way out ST Blum Kulka TTR because HBR 1 ibid p 180 aes Pym 2008 stat ss 195 No 8 2008 beca
51. use TTR Baker Toury Pym 2008 ee A Be universal ete g DTS Baker
Download Pdf Manuals
Related Search