Home
        Site Name/No
         Contents
1.                   Photograph numbers                 ABIOTIC PATCH RICHNESS DATA SHEET  p1 of 1                                                                 E v  N D              E  2      Abiotic Patch Type 2  s   5  amp   2  elz  elzZ 2 3 2 7   amp   fax A a  Mudflats and or Sandflats Beaches xX   X X X  TR on floodplain or exposed lake lagoon x  x    x  In channel Bars X    CX    A   Islands  larger than Slump Blocks  xX   X xX   X  X  X  Open Water  ponds  lakes  stream  slough xlxtixix  surfaces   Interfluves on floodplain X X  Tributary Channels and or Ditches X X xX   X   X   X  Scour Pits or pools on floodplain xX   X X  Debris Jams or Wrackline in channel or on    xX   X  floodplain  Hummocks and or Sediment Mounds xX    X  C   xX   X   X  Benches in channels or along shorelines xX    X     X     X X  Natural Levees X X X X  Persistent Slump Blocks in channels or along x  amp    amp l w xX x  shorelines  Pools in channels on exposed shorelines xX    X       X X  Swales in secondary channels on floodplains or xi xix xix x  along shorelines  Riffles and Runs in channels X X  Micro topographic Relief  rills  sediment  ribbons on bars  variegated shorelines and xX   xX  X    xX xX x  banks  burrows  etc   Other xX  X  X   X  X J x  Total Number of Possible Patch Types 18 i a 10   6   14          Abiotic Patch Richness  those present   expressed as a percent of all possible patch  types for that wetland class                          Note  X   s in parentheses  X  indi
2.   If yes  please elaborate     Briefly describe the features that were used to delineate the Assessment Area     Is the mouth of the lagoon open at the time of the assessment   circle one   yes   no    Complete the following only if the lagoon mouth is open    What time was the closest high or low tide coinciding with the field visit    Tide  circle one   high   low   Time     Based on the above information  what best describes the tidal stage over the course of the  time spent in the field     circle one      high tide low tide      Note  Where feasible  it is recommended that the assessment be conducted when the lagoon mouth is  open  and furthermore suggested that the assessment occur during low tide        CRAM METRICS DATA SHEET  p1 of 1        Site Name No        Wetland Class       Date  m d y        Investigators       Office  Score    Field  Score    Comment       Landscape Context         of AA w Buffer       Ave Buffer Width       Buffer Condition                Hydrology       Source of Water       Hydroperiod       Upland connection          Abiotic Structure       Abiotic Patch Richness       Topographic Complexity       Sediment Integrity                         Biotic Structure       Organic Matter Accum        Biotic Patch Richness       Vertical Structure       Interspersion Zonation       Plant Comm Integrity                               Stressor Index       Hydrology       Abiotic Structure       Biotic Structure       Adjacent Land Use       Subtotal    
3.  are Invasive                            What is the total number of co dominant species    for the tall herb layer                 PLANT COMMUNITY INTEGRITY DATA SHEETS  p3 of 4     Worksheet 3  of 5  to determine dominant plant species for the four vegetation    layers        Shrub Layer  multiple stems   lt  3 m in height        Plant species    Percent  Cover    Rank    Dominant   check one if       appl    Based on Based on  20  Rule 50  Rule    Invasive                                                        Total Percent Coverage       50  of Total Coverage       20  of Total Coverage         of Co dominant Species  that are Invasive                            What is the total number of co dominant species    for the shrub layer              PLANT COMMUNITY INTEGRITY DATA SHEETS  p4 of 4     Worksheet 4  of 5  to determine dominant plant species for the four vegetation    layers        Tree Layer  single trunk   gt  3 m in height        Plant species    Percent  Cover    Rank    Dominant   check one if       appl    Based on Based on  50  Rule 20  Rule    Invasive                             Total Percent Coverage       50  of Total Coverage       20  of Total Coverage            of Co dominants  Species that are Invasive                            What is the total number of co dominant species    for the tree layer           kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk    Worksheet 5  of 5  to assess Plant Community Integrity  based on Worksheets 
4.  assessment  If yes  please elaborate     Which best describes the gradient    of the reach you are assessing  circle one    high low  What is the apparent hydrologic flow regime    of the reach you are assessing  circle one    perennial intermittent ephemeral    If applicable  which best describes the current  seasonal  flow condition of the stream   circle one       low flow  base flow  high flow    Briefly describe the up  and downstream features used to delineate the Assessment Area     Upstream     Downstream     Briefly describe the streamside features used to delineate the Assessment Area          High gradient streams are defined as those that flow down an incline of  gt  2    Low gradient streams are  on gentle slopes of  lt 2         The hydrologic flow regime of a stream describes the frequency with which the channel conducts water   Perennial streams conduct water all year long  whereas ephemeral streams conduct water only during and  immediately following precipitation events  Intermittent streams are dry for part of the year  but conduct   water for periods longer than ephemeral streams  as a function of watershed size and water source        DEPRESSIONAL Wetland Information Data Sheet                                     Site Name No  Date  m d y   Investigators  Watershed County  Wetland Size  ha  GPS Coordinates of center of AA   as NAD 83 lat  lon    Assessment Area Size  ha  Restoration Mitigation Status  Total Office Time  hrs  CRAM Field Times _ Start  Sto
5.  very large areas        SPRING AND SEEP Wetland Information Data Sheet                      Site Name No  Date  m d y   Investigators  Watershed County          Wetland Size  ha     GPS Coordinates of center of AA     as NAD 83 lat  lon         Assessment Area Size  ha     Restoration Mitigation Status          Total Office Time  hrs        CRAM Field Times       Start        Stop        Do you have previous experience with this site  excluding work done during the office  assessment  If yes  please elaborate     Does the spring seep occur on a discernible slope   circle one  yes   no    Are there any distinct channels associated with the wetland   e g  a visible outflow    circle one  yes   no    If yes  briefly describe the channel s      Briefly describe the features that were used to delineate the Assessment Area        LACUSTRINE Wetland Information Data Sheet                                     Site Name No  Date  m d y   Investigators  Watershed County  Wetland Size  ha  GPS Coordinates of center of AA   as NAD 83 lat  lon    Assessment Area Size  ha  Restoration Mitigation Status  Total Office Time  hrs  CRAM Field Times _ Start  Stop                 Do you have previous experience with this site  excluding work done during the office  assessment  If yes  please elaborate     Is the lake natural or man made    circle one   Is the lake impounded by a dam   circle one  yes   no    Which situation best describes the hydrologic connectivity of the lake  The lake is  circ
6. 1     4          of Co dominants that are Invasive    Average  across the 4       Trees  Shrubs              Tall Herbs        Short Herbs     Layers              Draft Rating of Plant Community Integrity  based on result of Worksheet 5 above                          Percent of Co Dominants that are  Code    Invasive  A 0 25   B  gt  25 50   C  gt  50 75   D  gt  75 100                 CRAM STRESSOR INDEX DATA SHEET  p1 OF 2                                   Where to Stressor Index Raw Scores  Assess to 10  0   not present  10   highest stress     Set        oint Source  PS  Discharges  POTW  other non stormwater discharge   on point Source  Non PS  Discharges  urban runoff  farm drainage     Site Name No  Wetland Class Date  m d y   ow diversions    Investigators  Office   Final  Score   Score  ams  reservoirs  detention basins  recharge basins     ee  ee  ee  Ooo o To  ow obstructions  culverts  paved stream crossings  a a  ee ee  Oooo To  a a  a ee    ZelS ZlZlce  Qa  z  S  ea  S    eir drop structure  tide gates   redged inlet channel   ngineered channel  riprap  armored channel bank  bed   ike levees  fills  e g  from construction     E e Sid CS  BEE A S  E    subtora T       o iiaea    Same ae  Abiotic Structure Score   Score   e    Eling or dumping of sediment or soils  N A for restoration areas         e    _ Grading  compaction  N A for restoration area  l T   e     Plowing Discing  N A for restoration areas   Z O Z o Jo T         Resource extraction  Sediment  grave
7. CRAM Verification  Primer for Conducting the Verification of CRAM  January 2004    The following summarizes the steps involved in conducting CRAM during the  Verification Phase of CRAM development     In the office  prior to visiting the Site        1    check here when completed  _ Delineate a draft Assessment Area  AA      2   Conduct the    Office Assessment    portion of CRAM scoring  for all  applicable metrics and stressors     3   Document the rationale for your preliminary decisions and highlight any  areas of uncertainty for more focused review in the field     Once in the field        4   Walk the entire AA and buffer and verify your draft AA  revising as  necessary     5   Fill out the first part of the    Supplemental Information Data Sheet        6   Conduct the formal  field assessment of CRAM Metrics  The following  data sheets will be used for this phase of data collection     a  The    Wetland Information Data Sheet    specific to the wetland class  you are assessing that day       b  The    CRAM Metrics Data Sheets     which incorporate information for  the following   Please document your rationale in selecting the ratings you  record     I  The    Abiotic Patch Richness Data Sheet     I  The    Biotic Patch Richness Data Sheet     IIL  The    Plant Community Integrity    set of data sheets  7   Conduct the field assessment of CRAM Stressors using the    CRAM    Stressor Index Data Sheet       8   Fill out the second part  remainder  of the    Supplemental 
8. Information Data  Sheet     Remember to take photographs and or make sketches of your site and  any noteworthy features you encountered during the assessment     CRAM Primer  p 2 of 3   Back in the office     9   Enter your data into the Access Database provided by SCCWRP     10   After completing the above steps for all of your sites  forward the following  deliverables to SCCWRP     a   A copy of the following for each of your sites     I     Supplemental Information Data Sheet     Il     Wetland Information Data Sheet     Il     CRAM Metrics Data Sheet     IV     Abiotic Patch Richness Data Sheet     V     Biotic Patch Richness Data Sheet     VI     Plant Community Integrity    set of data sheets  VII     CRAM Stressor Index Data Sheet     VII  an aerial of the site indicating the AA that you used    b   The most recent CRAM Version 2 0  dated 27 January 2004  with your  comments inserted using    Track Changes     Please accept all previously   tracked changes before incorporating your own     c   A technical memo from each team summarizing feedback and  recommended changes relating to     o Metrics and attributes  o Stressors  o Possible future calibration measures    d   Digital photographs taken during your site visits along with clear  descriptions of location  and features items of interest that the photograph    depicts    e   Any suggestions input on data analysis    CRAM Primer  p 3 of 3   For CRAM Verification  please keep the following points in mind     e If  w
9. cate features that do not apply in tidal wetlands during high    tide  or in lagoons with a closed mouth at the time of assessment  regardless of tidal stage   The    reduced total number of features possible  in such situations  is provided in parentheses at the    bottom of the table        BIOTIC PATCH RICHNESS DATA SHEET  p1 of 1                                                                                                    ed z 2  Biotic Patch Type   Sig    a S      check for presence  3 S 5 aie 5 2 z     ares  2  S  8  8  Maja  Aa al  Fully submerged aquatic bed  e g   Vallisneria  Hydrilla  AqBed XXIX x x  Zostera   Submergent bed  e g   Potamogeton  Myriophyllum  SubBed X  X   X  X X  Rooted floating bed  e g   Ruppia  Hydrocotyle  Nymphaea  RootBed X X  X  X X  Free floating bed  e g   Lemna  Azolla  FreeFloat XXIX Q  X  Emergent dicot beds  e g   Polygonum  Plantago  EmDicots x x  x  x  xlx  Plagiobothrys   Short emergent monocot beds  e g   Distichlis  Eleocharis  ShrtMonocot  short Juncus    lt  35 cm tall  sels eee  Medium emergent monocot beds  e g  Sparganium  Phalaris  MedMonocot  medium size Scirpus  xX  xX  X   X  X  X   35 cm to 1 5 m tall   Tall emergent monocot beds  e g   Typha  Arundo  tall Scirpus    TallMonocot x x  x  x  xix    gt  1 5 m tall   Groundcover herbs and forbs  e g   Ranunculus  Potentilla  GCHerbs  Trifolium  Sagittaria XIXIX  XXX    lt  10 cm tall   Tall herbs and forbs and ferns  e g   Lythrum  Conium  Berula    TallHerbs  Delphiniu
10. hen scoring your wetland for a given metric  you feel that the table of options   e g  A     D  does not adequately describe the situation at hand  and an  intermediate value is needed  rather than scoring the wetland as such  e g      B 5       please assign whichever established category best describes the situation  e g      B     and provide a comment explaining why what you chose was not an ideal  descriptor and how you would modify it     e Please take photographs liberally during your site visits  Your photographs  should focus on examples of different    states    for each metric and areas of  potential confusion  Label each photo with the date  site  and subject of the photo   Keep good records of what your pictures depict  as we may use some of them to  demonstrate    prototype    conditions for the various metrics     e For Estuarine and Coastal Lagoon wetlands with an open mouth at the time of  assessment  it is preferable that you conduct CRAM at low tide  in order to be  able to assess as many of the Abiotic Structure features as possible     e If you are conducting CRAM on a tidal wetland  and it is not clear whether the  wetland is best classified as a coastal lagoon or an estuary  then conduct the  assessment for BOTH classes  The only metric that differs between these two  wetland classes is Hydroperiod  so rate the wetland according to both versions of  this metric  Make a clear note on the data sheet that this is what you did     e For Riverine wetlands  p
11. l  oil andiorgasy        O T  e  Vegetation management OOS   e     pe      i  Pe    a    gmg    Outside  AA    Vegeta a     Excessive sediment or organic debris from watershed   J    Rutrient impaired  PS or Non PS pollution    i  Heavy metal impaired  PS or Non PS pollution  pa  imi     Pesticide  or trace organics impaired  PS or Non PS pollution  EE aa  e  Bacteria and pathogen  impaired  PS or Non PS pollution  _   ef fishorrefse SSCS i  De pe oer OOS A       Subtotal by Attribute S    e        CRAM STRESSOR INDEX DATA SHEET  p2 OF 2        Site Name No  Wetland Class Date  m d y   Investigators                               Where to  Assess Stressor Index Raw Scores  continued     ml   lt  Office   Final   lt   Biotic Structure Score Score  tel  e    Excessive human visitation    6     Predation and habitat destruction by feral animals  e    Tree cutting sapling removal  e     Removal of woody debris  E  e     Pesticide application or vector control  e     Evidence of fire   e     Evidence of flood  SEa    Biological resource extraction  fisheries  aquaculture                             Subtotal by Attribute    Office Final  Landscape Context  Adjacent Land Use  Score Score    Urban residential  rs Industrial commercial     e  Military training Air traffic                                                       gt           Subtotalby Attribute S       
12. le  one      in channel within a floodplain disconnected isolated    Briefly describe the features that were used to delineate the Assessment Area        ESTUARINE Wetland Information Data Sheet                                     Site Name No  Date  m d y   Investigators  Watershed County  Wetland Size  ha  GPS Coordinates of center of AA   as NAD 83 lat  lon    Assessment Area Size  ha  Restoration Mitigation Status  Total Office Time  hrs  CRAM Field Times _ Start  Stop                 Do you have previous experience with this site  excluding work done during the office  assessment  If yes  please elaborate     Briefly describe the features that were used to delineate the Assessment Area     What time was the closest high or low tide coinciding with the field visit    Tide  circle one   high   low  Time     Based on the above information  what best describes the tidal stage over the course of the  time spent in the field  circle one      high tide low tide     Note  It is recommended that the assessment be conducted during low tide        COASTAL LAGOON Wetland Information Data Sheet                                     Site Name No  Date  m d y   Investigators  Watershed County  Wetland Size  ha  GPS Coordinates of center of AA   as NAD 83 lat  lon    Assessment Area Size  ha  Restoration Mitigation Status  Total Office Time  hrs  CRAM Field Times _ Start  Stop                 Do you have previous experience with this site  excluding work done during the office  assessment
13. lease take good notes on the plants and other features you  used to determine the lateral extents of the AA  and think of any comments you  may have that can assist in drafting clearer guidance on the issue     SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION DATA SHEET  p1 of 2     The first portion of this data sheet is to be filled out before beginning the formal CRAM  assessment  assignment of CRAM Metric and Stressor values   The second portion is to  be completed following the CRAM Metric Stressor assessment        Site Name No      Date        Wetland Class     Investigator s            In the following table  provide a    first impression     Gestalt  assignment of condition  level for the wetland based on each of 4 wetland attributes  on a scale of     10  with    1     equivalent to the lowest possible quality  and    10     the highest  Also provide an  overall rating for the wetland as a whole  In the last column  explain your reasoning in    assigning the ratings you chose     Be as broad     big picture     as possible in your    interpretation of the attributes  rather than limiting yourself to what you know of CRAM  scoring criteria        Attribute    Landscape  Context    General  Condition   1 to 10     Explanation of Condition Rating Assignment       Hydrology       Biological  Structure          Physical  Structure       Overall             SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION DATA SHEET  p2 of 2     Water Condition Dry Saturated Ponded Flowing    circle all that   apply   Clear Cloudy Mudd
14. m  Woodwardia    gt  10 cm tall  a lal ial ess  Shrubs  e g   Baccharis  Grindelia  Ribes  Rubus  Shrubs X  Xj  X  X  X X  Short deciduous trees  e g   Sambucus  Salix  Cornus  young ShortDecTree XXIX x  xlx  Alnus  young Plantanus  young Acer   lt  6 m tall   Tall deciduous trees  e g   old Acer  old Plantanus  old Alnus   gt    TallDecTree x xX x  xlx  6 m tall   Short non deciduous trees  e g   Tamarix  young Picea  young   ShortTree x x x  xlx  Pinus    lt  6 m tall   Tall non deciduous trees  e g   old Picea  old Pinus    gt  6 m tall    TallTree X X  X XIX  Moss bed Moss x X  X  X  X  Macroalgal mat Periphyton Macroalgal X X  X X  Shellfish bed Shellfish XIX  Diatom felt or mat DiatomMat XIX X  Standing tree snags Snags X X  X  X  X  X  Total Number of Possible Patch Types alalalsa  e  Biotic Patch Richness  those present  expressed as a  percent of all possible patch types for that wetland class        Note  X in parentheses  X  indicates a feature that does not apply in depressional wetlands when the wetland is not  ponded  The reduced total number of features possible  in such a situation  is provided in parentheses at the bottom    of the table        PLANT COMMUNITY INTEGRITY DATA SHEETS  p1 of 4     Worksheet 1  of 5  to determine dominant plant species for the four vegetation  layers           Short Herbs Layer  herbaceous plants that have a height of  lt  1 5 m        Dominant   check one if     Percent appl    Plant species Cover Rank Based on Based on    20  R
15. p                 Do you have previous experience with this site  excluding work done during the office  assessment  If yes  please elaborate     Which best describes the type of depressional wetland   other  specify      freshwater marsh alkaline marsh vernal pool alkali flat    Which best describes the hydrologic state of the wetland at the time of assessment   circle one       saturated soil     pouaceanundated but no surface water ay  What is the apparent hydrologic regime    of the wetland  circle one    long duration medium duration short duration    Does your wetland connect with the floodplain of a nearby stream   circle one  yes   no  Is the topographic basin of the wetland distinct or indistinct       circle one     If indistinct  please explain how you went about defining the Assessment Area          Long duration depressional wetlands are defined as supporting surface water for  gt  9 months of the year   in  gt  5 out of 10 years   Medium duration depressional wetlands are defined as supporting surface water  for between 4 and 9 months of the year  Short duration wetlands possess surface water between 2 weeks  and 4 months of the year     4 An indistinct topographic basin is one that lacks obvious boundaries between wetland and upland   Examples of such features are seasonal  depressional wetlands in very low gradient landscapes  such as  vernal pool complexes and large wet meadows  which may be intricately interspersed with uplands or  seemingly homogeneous over
16. ule 50  Rule       Invasive                                                        Total Percent Coverage       50  of Total Coverage       20  of Total Coverage         of Co dominant  Species that are Invasive                               What is the total number of co dominant species  for the short herb layer                      For each vegetation layer in the AA  the co dominant species are those that rank highest based on their  percent cover  relative to other vegetation within the same layer  Species are ranked in descending order of  relative percent cover for the vegetation layer in question  Then  in order of their rank  all species that  cumulatively reach 50  of the total coverage for that layer  plus any other species that individually  comprise 20  or more of the total coverage of that layer  are included as co dominants  For more details   see Appendix 5 of the CRAM User   s Manual  Results for all layers are entered in Worksheet 5     PLANT COMMUNITY INTEGRITY DATA SHEETS  p2 of 4     Worksheet 2  of 5  to determine dominant plant species for the four vegetation    layers        Tall Herbs Layer  herbaceous plants that have a height of  gt  1 5 m        Dominant   check       one if appl        Percent Based Based  9   Plant species Cover   Rank   705 an    Invasive   20  50   Rule Rule                                                       Total Percent Coverage       50  of Total Coverage       20  of Total Coverage            of Co dominant Species that 
17. y Other  Algae Trash Foam Oil    Dominant Plant Communities  List all plant communities observed  using the Sawyer  amp  Keeler Wolf  series provided in Appendix 4 of the CRAM User   s Manual  Include estimated   cover of each    Community Name   cover Community Name   cover                                              kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk    The following information is to be filled out after completing the CRAM Metrics and Stressors portion of  the Verification for a given site     Evidence of Wildlife Use  list any species that were observed during the site assessment   Reptile           User Questionnaire   Were all the metrics relevant        Were there any missing metrics        Were there specific metrics that didn   t work well  or that need some adjustment        Was the stressor index relevant        Were there any missing stressors        Was the AA delineation appropriate        Did the outcome of CRAM reflect your initial perception of the site  Explain     RIVERINE Wetland Information Data Sheet                                           Site Name No  Date  m d y   Investigators   Watershed County   GPS Coordinates Upstream limit Downstream limit    as NAD 83 lat  lon     of AA  of AA    Assessment Area Size  ha  Restoration Mitigation Status   Total Office Time  hrs  CRAM Field Times  Start  Stop                 Do you have previous experience with this site  excluding work done during the office 
    
Download Pdf Manuals
 
 
    
Related Search
    
Related Contents
  メインスイッチステー TYPE−B 取扱説明書  FRA  Mode d`emploi - Husqvarna Viking  User manual OMR 300H English Date: 11/2006  HP NC373F User's Manual  Texte intégral PDF  Aroma AWK-290BD electrical kettle  Classe Audio CAP-2100 Stereo Amplifier User Manual  8 - Aquafax.co.uk    Copyright © All rights reserved. 
   Failed to retrieve file