翻訳規範、ハビトゥス、ローカリゼーション
Contents
1. GE cou2. TER ANA Sela Sheffy 2005
3. 2007
4. LISA 2007 Skopos
5. EE 1990 55 P 1993 154 E Gibid 155 E
6. GIRE Toury idiosyncrasies SL TL 2 2 2 poles rules norms E initial norms
7. 2 Even Zohar m all Au ali 3 Toury DTS Toury 1995 Even Zohar Toury
8. 123 Bi 4 Toury Gibid Toury 199 Toury I4 ARITA translation i activities to play a social role 1
9. descriptive S practitioners Toury 1995 17 BRO 2 Jf Toury 15 6 DT Hermans 1995 dg Hermans 1999 EXE prescriptive ERV Toury
10. 125 E Legitimacy I E zi E 3 N N Bourdieu
11. E orthodoxie heterodoxy HRO DS I Sela Shaffy 2005 5 Simeoni 1998 Simeoni Toury TT E 3 T submissive B Lor servants Simeoni 20
12. lt 129 Toury BISUERE DRBES 2 YAMADA Masaru a VES 75 yamada Qapple eye com Tf o 1 Toury 1980 1995 Translational Competence Chomsky 1965
13. c ico Simeoni a HE L MRITA Z OPRANE EERE 8 Toury Gouanvic 2005 Ingilleri 2003 2005 Sela Shaffy 2005 Wai Ping 2007 Sela Shaffy 2005 Simeoni bid OX 0 Simeoni ibid
14. TT textual
15. E 2 valaev SL TL SL TL SL TL SL initial norm prescriptive adequate acceptable TL adequate acceptable initial norm 2 formal dynamic equivalence foreignization domestication Toury DTS
16. extratextual F 127 zi E 3 N N Toury 7
17. 8 SE W xm cR SEXERHRR CUL NE Gnvisibility Venuti 1995 2 2001
18. Toury v 2 Even Zohar Toury Even Zohar 1978 1990 polysystem theory Even Zohar Even Zohar 1920
19. B DTS ST TT coupled pair DTS 6 1973 2007 24
20. Sela Shaffy Gouanvic 2005 6 Simeoni Toury Simeonn Toury CE 6 Toury 7
21. 128 Qr 7 1
22. laws of translational behavior Tory DTS SL TL C TL Nid Dynamic equivalence Catford Shift formal correspondence 2007 A
23. competence performance 2 extratextual 2007 X Toury 199 extratextual 2007 2007 Simeoni 1998 Gouanvic 2005 Sela Sheffy 2005 3 Jeremy Munday 2001 Ch 3 Ch 4 x Y 4 Jackobson R 1960 Closing statements Linguistics and poetics In T A Sebeok Ed Style in language Cambridge MA MIT Press 350 377 5 formal equivalence dynamic equivalence Nida 1965 amp foreignization domestication
24. DTS 5 1993 155 1T Gbid 5 F champ field Wb BIR Z H
25. Toury p 65 textual extratextual Gbid Toury Bs x DTS E laws of translation Competence Performance ST TT EEC DTS HARO
26. extra textual Even Zohar high form low form cenrraD periphery 3 literary a crystallized
27. STTT DTS laws of translational behavior bid 299 Baker 1998 121 2 bid 164 BEven Zohar Toury X
28. b co Even Zohar 1978 1990 193 194 adequate SL 122 d zu HB S pi
29. touched on with raising further research questions that need to be addressed 1 Translational norms prescribe Shuttleworth amp Cowie 1997 113 Descriptive Translation Studies Pure translation studies Gibid DTS Competence Performance ibid 113 114 rules idiosyncrasies Toury 1995 54 Toury
30. Toury reconstruct 2 textual extratextual textual extratextual textual TT ST DTS 3
31. Venuti 1995 6 Because the habitus is an infinite capacity for generating products thoughts perceptions expressions and actions whose limits are set by the historically and socially situated conditions of its production the conditioned and conditional freedom it provides is as remote from creation of unpredictable novelty as it is from simple mechanical reproduction of the original conditioning Bourdieu 1990 55 7 LISA The Localization Industry Standards Association http www lisa org 8 Skopos Vermeer 1978 130 Baker M 1998 Norms In M Baker Ed Routledge encyclopedia of translation studies London New York Routledge Bourdieu P 1990 The logic of practice R Nice Trans Stanford CA Stanford University Press TE 1993 SR Bourdieu P 1977 Algerie 60 structures economiques et structures temporelles Paris Les Editions de Minuit Chomsky N 1965 Aspects of the theory of syntax Cambridge MA MIT
32. Manchester St Jerome Simeoni D 1998 The pivotal status of the translator s habitus Target 10 1 1 39 2007 Toury G 1980 In search of a theory of translation Tel Aviv The Porter Institute ES Js Toury G 1995 Descriptive translation studies and beyond Amsterdam Philadelphia John Benjamins Venuti L 1995 The translator s invisibility A history of translation London Routledge Wai Ping Y 2007 Norms polysystems and ideology A case study The Translator 13 2 321 339 131 zi It 57 68 2007 19 38 132 4 H 2001 2007 A 7
33. Press Even Zohar I 1978 1990 The position of translated literature within the literary polysystem In L Venuti Ed The translation studies reader London New York Routledge 192 197 Gouanvic J 2005 A Bourdieusian theory of translation or the coincidence of practical instances Field Habitus capital and Illusio J Moore Trans The Translator 11 2 147 166 Hermans T 1995 Revisiting the classics Toury s empiricism version one The Translator 1 2 215 223 Hermans T 1999 Translation in systems Manchester St Jerome Inghilleri M 2003 Habitus field and discourse Interpreting as a socially situated activity Target 15 2 243 268 Inghilleri M 2005 Mediating zones of uncertainty The Translator 11 1 69 85 R 1973 2007 3 43 Munday J 2001 Introducing translation studies Theories and applications London New York Routledge Sela Sheffy R 2005 How to be a recognized translator Rethinking habitus norms and the field of translation Target 17 1 1 26 Shuttleworth M amp Cowie M 1997 Dictionary of translation studies
34. ST TT HRANT IC UCASERS adequate acceptable Even Zohar adequate acceptable 124 Cp RR OD X SO HIR E Toury
35. MRR DEYA B a sl Abstract Focusing on Gideon Toury s translational norms this article reconsiders in depth meanings of the term norms and explores possibilities to develop methodological approaches for relating the norms to Bourdieusian concepts of field and habitus Also its application to localization is taken into consideration as a part of case study for my future research project According to Toury 1995 translation is a norm governed activity however the term norms are understood differently among researchers and practitioners Practitioners treat norms in a prescriptive sense telling them what the translation should be whereas researchers from descriptive and pure translation studies regard them as descriptive statements stating what the translation is The difference is captured in terms of a descriptive aspect in this paper In turn the descriptive norms are compared with Bourdieusian model of habitus as well as field specifically the two methods to study norms textual and extratextual suggested by Toury are reduced into habitus and field respectively In the last part of the paper the application of this method to a case study translation practice in localization fields are
Download Pdf Manuals
Related Search