Home
        Hardware-In-The-Loop - Mechanical Engineering
         Contents
1.   3      4      5      6      7      8            9      10      11      12     
2.   52   49   47       aaa  eal  0  LGRN      lt   m  S      e      p  o  m  m  1  Z  Lenzi        Fig  7  2070 Controller Output Configurator    B  2070 Controller Output Configurator    The 2070 controller output configuration application was  developed to match the URMS configuration convention  The  diagram used in the configurator to show the output file  current assignments  see Figure 7  is the same as that used in   1  to describe the physical output number for each output  file slot for a Model 334 cabinet  An output configurator  was implemented in order to map every phase indication  used in the simulation to the corresponding phase in the  2070 controller  as recommended in  5   In this configuration  application  it is possible to independently read the phase of  each active output  When this feature is used in conjunction  with the URMS Output File Test  Output Signal Test  and or  Lights Test utilities  it is easy to check if the simulation and  the URMS output signal assignments match and if the phase  states are read properly by the simulation     C  Freeway Simulator    The constant velocity microscopic mainline traffic model  described earlier is implemented in the freeway simulator  application  There are three components associated with  this part of the simulation  1  the freeway simulation user  interface  shown in Figure 8  2  a freeway layout menu   see Figure 4 left    and 3  a vehicle menu  The simulation  interface is used to observe the movement of 
3.   University of California  Berkeley  horowitz berkeley edu   P  Varaiya is a Professor at Department of Electrical Engineering  Uni   versity of California  Berkeley  varaiya eecs berkeley edu    dual loop detectors  it will be possible to estimate the queue   length 2   The second method estimates the queue length  using a vehicle re identification algorithm  3    4   This  scheme is based on matching individual vehicle signatures  obtained from Sensys wireless sensor arrays placed at the  two ends of the on ramp    Before deploying a 2070 controller with a modified URMS  in the Hegenberger on ramp  it must be thoroughly de   bugged  In addition  the modified software must be tested  and approved by D4 engineers before it can be used on  the field  The unmodified URMS software has already been  debugged and tested by Caltrans engineers before its release  for preliminary testing in the field using a traditional traffic  controller suitcase tester device  see Figure 1   However  one  of the main drawbacks of this tester is the need to manually  operate mechanical switches to simulate loop detector sig   nals  This debugging and testing approach becomes difficult  and sometimes inappropriate when coordination of signal  actuation is required  as will be the case for the field test  To  debug and test the modified URMS  it will be necessary to  recreate the dual detector signals used to measure vehicle  speed upstream of the on ramp  with good accuracy  For  this reason  it wa
4. Hardware In The Loop On ramp Simulation Tool to Debug and Test  the Universal Ramp Metering Software    Rene O  Sanchez  Roberto Horowitz and Pravin Varaiya    Abstract    An on ramp simulation system that can be used  to debug and test the Universal Ramp Metering Software   URMS  is presented  The tool includes a simple car following  microscopic traffic model for the on ramp and a Controller  Interface Device  CID   which interfaces a standard personal  computer with a 2070 traffic controller  The CID consists of  the low cost and commonly available National Instruments  NI   USB 6501 24 Channel Digital I O device and a basic circuit that  interfaces the 5 Volt TTL logic from the Digital I O board to the  2070 controller  The resulting hardware in the loop simulation  tool systematically reads the phase states from the controller  and changes detector states based on the cars trajectories as  displayed on the on ramp simulator  With this tool it is possible  to check the performance of the 2070 controller running the  URMS as if the traffic controller was operating on a standard  on ramp managed by Caltrans  Finally  the real time nature of  this tool is discussed based on a quantitative analysis of the  simulator performance running on the Windows XP operating  system     I  INTRODUCTION    A hardware in the loop simulation  HILS  system was  developed as a tool to assist in the completion of a ramp  metering field test  This field test has been proposed in order  to imple
5. W standard functions  that can easily be accessed from the simulation     The custom made circuit was designed to interface the 5   Volt TTL logic from the digital I O board to the 2070 con   troller  This circuit was built using a modular IC breadboard  socket  SN706 TTL hex inverter buffers drivers with open   collector high voltage outputs  one 7805A voltage regulator   and a 12 Volt power supply    Two main goals of the CID design stage were portability  and low cost  The portability was ensured with the use of a  small USB DIO board that can be used in most personal  computers  The low cost was achieved by using one of  the cheapest data acquisition boards on the market  The  components to build the CID presented in this paper cost  less than 200 U S  dollars     B  Software Interface Module    The software interface model provides the linkage between  the CID and the traffic simulation program  The NI USB   6501 board used to build the CID comes with drivers that  can be used to develop customized applications using NI  LabVIEW  These drivers serve as the software interface  module  and do not require any modification when used in  the HILS tool     C  Microscopic Simulation Engine    The simulation engine was developed using the NI Lab   VIEW development environment  Before deciding to create a  custom traffic microscopic simulator  commercial simulator  packages were considered  However  the time steps used in  these simulators were not low enough for the resolution d
6. ainline loop detectors actuation    B  On ramp Model    A simplified car following traffic model  based on  11    was used to simulate vehicles on the on ramp  This is  a simple model specifically conceived for a homogeneous  highway in which the nth vehicle follows the same trajectory  as the  n 1 th vehicle except for a translation in space and  time  It was necessary to incorporate the ramp metering  traffic signal into the model  which can be considered as an  inhomogeneity  by specifying rules of how vehicles react to  the signal  The rules that were specified are  1  a car in front  of the traffic light must stop when the light is red  and 2   only a predetermined number of cars can advance per green  phase  It was decided to use this model because it is simple  but captures dynamics that are important for an accurate  generation of detector signals  There is a particular interest  in testing algorithms that use vehicle speed close to the on   ramp entrance to estimate queue length  This model allows  for changes in speed based on driver behavior parameters  and the presence of vehicles ahead  With this model it is  also possible to introduce queue dynamics in the simulation   a feature necessary for the accurate generation and timing of  on ramp detector signals    For the simulation  it is necessary to know parameters  related to the length of the on ramp  the length of the loop  detectors  and the position of the loop detector with respect  to the ramp entrance  All 
7. ccupancy  and speed    The HILS system presented in this paper has three basic  components  1  a controller interface device  CID   2  a  software interface module  and 3  a microscopic simulation  engine  A description of each component is presented below     a     Computer 2070 Controller    Controller Interface Device  CID     Detector    Detector    States              Phase  States    Phase  States          b   Computer running Simulation Tool  Fig  2   a  On ramp simulation tool architecture  b  On ramp simulation  tool setup    A  Computer Interface Device  CID     This device provides the interface from the 2070 traffic  controller to the personal computer running the traffic simu   lation  The CID has two main elements  1  the NI USB 6501  device and 2  a custom electronic circuit    The NI USB 6501 is a portable digital Input Output de   vice  which provides data acquisition and control capabilities   With plug and play USB connectivity  the NI USB 6501 is  very versatile and can be used in most personal computers   The NI USB 6501 has 24 single ended digital lines  which  comprise three DIO ports  In this tool  two ports are con   figured to generate detector signals and one port is used to  read the phase states output from the controller  This device  was chosen because of its low price  portability  and because  when used with LabVIEW  it provides a straightforward  procedure to interface with the simulation engine  Signals  can be sent and received using LabVIE
8. e   sired for this application  e g  CORSIM uses a   second time  step while VISSIM can not go lower than 100 milliseconds   This limitation was one reason for developing a microscopic  simulation specifically for an on ramp freeway system with a  time step between   and 10 milliseconds  Another reason was  to have the flexibility to customize the simulation engine to  complement some features of the URMS  e g  configuration  and testing menus                          Q O D d  o  LO     On ramp Deman  Traffic Light State        JJ 10 A  data available from D4    available from 2070 Controller  o 9 A  ae Legend    T1 L1 L   Leading Detector  A 95 1 cal e   Sasi cenit  Boe et ig eee eee ees ee eee Bie Pessage Delecioi  eree a a E L3 D   Demand Detector   T4 L4 LO   On ramp Leading Detector                         TO   On ramp Trailing Detector  Q   Queue Detector              amama  Detection Station   data available from PeMS     Fig  3   a  Hegenberger Rd  loop on ramp to 880 southbound  b   Hegenberger on ramp mainline layout used for the simulation tool    HI  THE MODEL    In order to simulate the Hegenberger on ramp freeway  system  see Figure 3 a    it was necessary to use a simplified  layout that would capture the detector location and the ramp  characteristics  Figure 3 b  shows a simplified configuration  of the Hegenberger onramp freeway system that follows the  NTCIP typical on ramp layout as close as possible  8   which  is also the standard configuration used in t
9. e 2070 controller  Using this interface  it  is also possible to set and modify simulation parameters   In the on ramp layout menu  the dimension of the on   ramp segment  the detectors location  their length  and their  separation can be set  Finally  the vehicle menu is used to  determine the properties of the three types of vehicles present  in the on ramp simulator    S Simulator v1 1 vi BEX     Eile Edit View Project Operate Tools Window Help Fearn          elu  We                         On ramp Simulator   Freeway Simulator   2070 Input Configurator 2070 Output Configurator Debugging Tools    On ramp Simulator   On ramp Layout   VehicleType   Driver Behavior    ON RAMP SIMULATOR    Traffic Light Information  Traffic Light    Ramp Parameters  Time Interval    J 30 Seconds Loop Detectors    Traffic Light  Demand  veh  TI  Assignment j    Pin Assignment  J16   RM Rate  Veh TI    t 15 Dual Trailing Dual Leading Red Lower Green  Trucks   on    OL1  f RED  f LGRNI Sf  f n    Qi sh    ae Yellow  GRN1 ai vea wf                      M7 NATIONAL  p INSTRUMENTS    LabVIEW Student Edition       Fig  9  On ramp simulator interface    V  BENCHMARKING    This tool was designed to simulate traffic conditions on an  on ramp freeway system and update vehicle positions and  detector states in real time  In the context of this project     real time means that the HILS system should simulate the  displacement of vehicles  check if the vehicles are on a  detection zone  and update detector 
10. ent environment  This software is composed  of four elements  1  the 2070 controller input configurator   2  the 2070 controller output configurator  3  a freeway  simulator  and 4  an on ramp simulator  When the program  is run  the user can decide if any configurator will be used  If  the configuration process for the inputs or outputs is skipped   the configuration stored in the computer will be used by  the program  After the configuration process is completed or  bypassed  the on ramp and freeway simulations start  In the  following  each component of the software is described    S simulator vitvi    Eile Edit View Project Operate Tools Window Help    zj   gt Een ga                                  On ramp Simulator   Freeway Simulator 2070 Input Configurator   2070 Output Configurator   Debugging Tools    2070 Controller Input Configurator   Breadboard Cable Layout    2j est ape  ets   e   o     a   az  Ap C1 46   C1 50   C1 49   C155   C151   C1 57   C159   C1 61   C181   C1 79   C153   C1 41   C143   C       S    JK JE  gt   gt  Diu l          11   10   16   12   18   20   22   46   44   14   2 6  S  ot AY  Nc SA  nc By  mca Sy  m3 By   ra NC OY  Nc BY  Nc Ry  UNC Sy  2 By  o2 Sy  oF   C1 47   C1 48   C1 56   C1 52   C1 58   C1 60   C1 62   C1 80   C1 82   C1 54   C1 40    lt a ap  gt   gt       lt  Cc          gt     lt  cs a  9   T7   13   19  21   23   45   47   15  z Pi B e i BBY  nc M Ma Mr By  Nc RSI  Nc A ie KA EA                      Fig  6  2070 Controller In
11. ffect the aggregate mainline speed since it is  calculated as an average over a URMS calculation interval   For any practical purposes  the   1 5 mph uncertainty will  not affect the velocity estimation on the on ramp     At Ataverage oO Atmax Atactual   At1  1 ms 2 00 0 506 17 97 63   2 ms 2 09 0 465 17 98 99   3 ms 3 26 0 553 17 99 20   4 ms 4 19 0 426 17 99 60   5 ms 5 20 0 492 18 99 69   10 ms 10 25 0 476 23 99 76   25 ms 25 34 0 478 30 99 96   50 ms 50 93 0 271 56 99 91   TABLE I    BENCHMARKING RESULTS OF 60 000 SIMULATION STEP RUNS FOR  DIFFERENT Af     V max tactuation tcontroller V controller  On ramp 40 mph 408 32 ms 408 32   16 ms 40  1 5 mph  Freeway 80 mph 204 16 ms 204 16   16 ms 80  6 4 mph  TABLE II    SIMULATED LOOP DETECTOR SIGNAL UNCERTAINTY FOR At   2 ms   Lietector 1 8 m and Legr  5 5 m     VI  CONCLUSION    This paper presented a hardware in the loop on ramp eval   uation system for the URMS  which consists of a personal  computer running an on ramp microscopic traffic model  a    CID and a 2070 controller running the URMS  The system  was developed to assist in the debugging and testing process  involved with the release of a URMS version for deployment  in the field  Since this tool was specifically tailored for a  2070 controller running the URMS  it allows for an easy  configuration of the system and a user friendly interface  that matches or complements some of the URMS debugging  features  The paper also presented an analysis of the real   time nat
12. he URMS  The  ramp layout had to be slightly modified to incorporate dual  detection for queue length estimation    A traffic controller operating on an on ramp in California  is usually programmed to collect data from the on ramp de   tectors  set the traffic light phase states  and collect mainline  detection stations data  sometimes multiple mainline detec   tion stations   In order for the simulation tool to generate  the signals that a traffic controller would encounter in the  field  it was decided to simulate traffic conditions on the  Hegenberger on ramp mainline system with two completely  different models  1  a constant velocity microscopic mainline  traffic model and 2  a simplified car following on ramp traffic  model  The 2070 controller is able to read the detector states  set by both models and can update the on ramp simulation  metering rate  phase states   With this approach  on ramp  traffic conditions do not have any effect on the mainline  freeway simulation  However  simulated mainline traffic  conditions may have an effect on the on ramp simulation  depending on the ramp metering algorithms implemented in  the URMS  The simulation tool was designed in this way in  order to test traffic responsive ramp metering algorithms like  ALINEA  9   where mainline traffic conditions read by the  controller are used to set the metering rate at the on ramp   It should be noted that this tool only allows testing the open  loop behavior of ramp metering algorithms  as 
13. ment queue control on the Hegenberger Rd  loop on   ramp to 880 southbound in the Caltrans Bay Area District   D4  to study its effect in minimizing queue and mainline  density oscillations and enhancing performance  This will  be accomplished by using a 2070 traffic controller running  a modified Universal Ramp Metering Software  URMS    which is a recently developed program that allows the 2070  traffic controller to function as a ramp metering controller  for use throughout California 1     To prevent on ramp queues from spilling over into surface  streets and interfering with the street traffic  the queue length  must be regulated  If the queue length could be measured  an  asymptotically stable PI regulator can be designed to stabilize  the closed loop queue dynamics  2   However  the PI regula   tor needs the current queue length as its feedback signal   which unfortunately is not available in the field  For the  field test  two different queue length estimation methods will  be evaluated  The first method is a queue length estimator  based on a simplified model for the driving behavior of a  vehicle that is approaching the end of the queue  the vehicle  decelerates at a constant rate from its cruising speed  until it  stops  By measuring speed upstream of the on ramp  using    R  O  Sanchez is with the Department of Mechanical Engineering   University of California  Berkeley  r2sanche me berkeley edu   R  Horowitz is a Professor at Department of Mechanical Engineering 
14. on time  Atactua   occur  Offsets  introduce by having Atactua      At at the ith simulation step  can be removed at the  i 1 th simulation step    In order to show that the HILS system is a reliable tool  to debug and test the URMS  it was important to quantify  the uncertainty introduced by not developing this tool on  a real time operating system environment  As a result  a  benchmarking procedure was used to characterize the real   time nature of the software  8 simulation runs  of 60 000  simulation steps each  were executed using different desired  time steps  At   The actual time step  Atgeryqi  Was recorded  for each simulation step and stored into a file  These data  were used to determine the time reliability of this tool as a  function of At    The results of the analysis are presented in Table I and  show that Atactual for at least 97 5  of the steps is within one  millisecond of At  The worst performance is observed when  At   1 ms  As At increases  the percentage of Atactual that are  within one ms of At increases  while the standard deviation  decreases  Based on Table I and Figure 10  choosing At    2 ms provides the time resolution needed for the HILS tool  while introducing an acceptable error on the generation of  the detector signals    In order to quantify the effect of time uncertainty on  the detector signals  a worst case scenario analysis for At    2 ms was performed  The shortest signals generated by  the simulator  which are also the most affected b
15. put Configurator    A  2070 Controller Input Configurator    The 2070 controller input configuration application was  developed to match the URMS configuration convention   The diagram used in the configurator to show the Input File  current assignments  see Figure 6  is the same as that used  in  1  to describe the physical input number for each input  file slot for a Model 334 cabinet  An input configurator  was included in this tool  because it is necessary to map  every detector used in the simulation to the corresponding  detector in the 2070 controller  as recommended in  5   In  this configuration application  it is possible to independently  change the state of each active input  When this feature is    used in conjunction with the URMS Input File Test utility  it  is straightforward to check if the simulation and the URMS  signal assignments match and if the detector states are read  properly by the 2070 controller               amp  Simulator v1 1 vi BEX  File Edit View Project Operate Tools Window Help     gt een   a                                On ramp Simulator Freeway Simulator 2070 Input Configurator 2070 Output Configurator Debugging Tools                   lt  D  I TEHES TEE    al o  m      N       wo  D   D  2 m m  Z    H wf  vf  1 R AIN   A   l           9   10   11   12   13   14   C1 97   C1 94  C1 91  C1     40    C1 88  C1 85   C1 33  53   50   48 Fey  C1 98   C1 95 C1 101  C1 89   C1 86   C1 100  ze   C1 99   C1 96  C1 93   C1 90   C1 87   C1 84  55 
16. s decided to design and build a hardware   in the loop simulation system to replicate in real time the  Hegenberger on ramp detector signals        Fig  1  Traffic controller suitcase tester used to evaluate the URMS    Il  HARDWARE IN THE LOOP SIMULATION    The hardware in the loop simulation  HILS  concept has  been used to create a simulation tool to test the URMS  running on a 2070 controller  A particular feature of this  type of architecture is that the traffic simulation model does  not implement any control logic  instead it controls traffic  flow in the simulation based on the phase states produced    by the traffic signal control equipment  Simultaneously  the  traffic signal control equipment uses the detector signals  generated by the simulation to update its control logic  see  Figure 2 a    5   HILS has been used in the past to interface  with traffic signal control equipment for testing purposes   however  previous systems focused on testing intersection  control software  The simulation time step used in these  systems is on the order of seconds  and equipment is used  primarily to simulate loop detector signals used by traffic  controllers to determine car presence and a rough estimate  of occupancy  6    7   The tool presented in this paper is  primarily designed to generate  through simulation  traffic  detector signals for an on ramp freeway system  see Figure  3 b   with sufficient resolution to allow the 2070 controller  to accurately calculate volume  o
17. states with a time equal  or less than the actual time it would take vehicles to travel  the same displacement on a real on ramp freeway system   Furthermore  it is desired to achieve the smallest possible  simulation time step  At  in order to increase the resolution  of the detector signals sent to the 2070 controller    The real time nature of the hardware in the loop simu   lation  HILS  tool is limited by the performance of the  Windows XP operating system  which only permits a 1  ms time resolution  Even though an actual HILS simulation  step  Atactual  may take less than 1 ms  this time is usually  larger  since Windows XP does not have sufficient real   time capability to effectively implement such precise timing   5   To compensate for this limitation  the simulation was  designed so that the timing of the simulator would be based  on three time stamps  1  a reference time stamp obtained  at the beginning of the simulation run  t    2  a time stamp  recorded in the  i 1 th simulation step  t _    and 3  a time  stamp obtained in the current  ith  simulation step  t    To  update any quantity that needs the total simulation time  the  difference between t  and t  is used  For quantities that need  the time increment between the  i 1 th and the ith simulation  steps  e g  to calculate position increments  the difference  between t  and t _  is used  This configuration helps maintain  accurate simulation timing even when variations in the  actual simulation step executi
18. there is no  interaction of the on ramp and the mainline model                                            Fig  4      left  Freeway layout  right  On ramp layout    A  Freeway Mainline Model    A constant velocity microscopic mainline traffic model  was used to model vehicle trajectories on the mainline  In  this model  the cars of a given freeway lane travel at the  same speed  and their position is updated every simulation  period  The car trajectories start at the beginning of the  freeway segment  and end when the car reaches the end of the  freeway segment  given by the user specified freeway length   see Figure 4  left    The cars are generated based on the flow  specified for every calculation interval  The URMS software  calculates aggregates of mainline data every 30 seconds  For    this reason  parameters for a given lane can be updated every  30 second calculation interval in the simulation  However   the calculation interval should be set taking the data used to  feed the simulator into account  For example  if PeMS  10   data are used  the calculation interval should be set equal to  the time granularity used in the data set    The model for the freeway can be very simple because  the main objective of this part of the tool is to generate  loop detector signals that the controller can read to calculate  aggregate values for each calculation interval  and use these  aggregate values as the input for traffic responsive ramp  metering controllers        Fig  5     M
19. these parameters can be specified  using the simulator on ramp layout menu  as shown in Figure  4  right   For the Hegenberger on ramp  these parameters  were obtained from Goolge Earth          and  12      C  Vehicle Loop Interaction    The loop detector signals generated by the simulation tool  are actuated based on vehicle positions  Both simulations  have the location of the loop detectors with respect to  the beginning of the freeway segment and the beginning  of the on ramp  respectively  When any of the data points    representing a vehicle is on the detection zone specified by  the location of its leading and trailing edge  the detector  signal is triggered  The interaction between loop detectors  and cars occurs in real time  Whenever the display in the  simulator shows an active detector  the detector signal read  by the controller for that specific detector is active as well   see Figure 5   This is a desired feature for a debugging tool   since it helps to visually identify what is the state of each  signal going into the controller    In order to recreate the signals generated in a real on   ramp freeway system more realistically  three types of vehi   cles can be generated in the simulator  1  cars  2  pickups   and 3  trucks  Each vehicle has an independent length  shape   and probability of occurrence  The particular shape of each  car can be observed in Figure 5     IV  SIMULATION TOOL    The simulation software was developed using the NI Lab   VIEW developm
20. ure of the simulator that shows that for all practical  purposes  Windows XP limited real time capabilities do not  affect the performance of the HILS tool  Future research  involves adding more versatility to the tool and enabling  communication with the controller in order to increase syn   chronization     Symbol Name Unit  At desired simulation time step ms  Ataverage average simulation execution time ms  A eee actual simulation execution time ms  Ate maximum recorded time step ms  oO standard deviation ms  V mnax maximum velocity used in simulation mph  Ldetector loop detector length m  Lear average regular car length m  tocrianon theoretical detector actuation time based on V max ms  tcontroller detector actuation time recorded by 2070 controller ms  Veontroller Velocity calculated by 2070 controller mph    TABLE III  LIST OF SYMBOLS    REFERENCES    D  Wells and E  Torizno     URMS  Universal Ramp Metering Software  User Manual     tech  rep   Traffic Operations  Caltrans  Version 1 07   2008    X  Sun  Modeling  Estimation  and Control of Freeway Traffic  PhD  thesis  University of California  Berkeley  2005    K  Kwong  R  Kavaler  R  Rajagopal  and P  Varaiya     A practi   cal scheme for arterial travel time estimation based on vehicle re   identification using wireless sensors     in Transportation Research  Board 89th Annual Meeting  2009    K  Kwong  R  Kavaler  R  Rajagopal  and P  Varaiya     Arterial travel  time estimation based on vehicle re identification 
21. using wireless sen   sors     Submited for publication to TRC    D  Bullock  B  Johnson  R  B  Wells  M  Kyte  and Z  Li     Hardware   in the loop simulation     Transportation Research Part C  Emerging  Technologies  vol  12  no  1  pp  73     89  2004    Z  Li  B  Johnson  A  Abdel Rahim  and M  Kyte     Hardware and  software design of an automated testing tool for traffic controllers     in  Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference  2006  ITSC    06  IEEE   pp  1525 1530  Sept  2006    E  Kwon  S  Kim  and T  M  Kwon     Pseudo real time evaluation of  adaptive traffic control strategies using hardware in loop simulation      in Industrial Electronics Society  2001  IECON    01  The 27th Annual  Conference of the IEEE  vol  3  pp  1910 1914 vol 3  2001       NTCIP 1207 2001  v01 17  National Transportation Communications  for ITS Protocol  Object Definition for Ramp Meter Control  RMC   units     tech  rep   ASSHTO ITE NEMA  2001    H  Hadj Salem  J  M  Blosseville  and M  Papageorgiou     Alinea  a  local feedback control law for on ramp metering  a real life study      pp  194 198  May 1990    PeMS     PeMS website     url http   pems eecs berkeley edu  accessed  2 3 2009  2009    G  F  Newell     A simplified car following theory  a lower order model      Transportation Research Part B  Methodological  vol  36  no  3   pp  195     205  2002    T  O  Program     Ramp Meter Design Manual     tech  rep   California  Department of Transportation  2000      1      2  
22. vehicles through  the defined freeway segment  With this interface  information  related to the simulation can be accessed and it is possible to  set and modify freeway lane parameters independently  In the  freeway layout menu  the dimension of the mainline segment   the detector location  and the detector separation can be set   Finally  the vehicle menu is used to determine the properties  of the three types of vehicles present in the simulation   The vehicle parameters for the mainline simulation can be  different from those used on the on ramp simulator           Freeway Simulator   Freeway Layout   Vehicle Type    MULTIPLE LANE FREEWAY SIMULATOR      Simulation Info   Simulation Info  Lane 2 Parameters Lane 3 Parameters    Simulation Info   Simulation Info    Lane 1 Parameters    144271 Parameters Parameters 2    low  Veh  TI  Speed  mph                    Wy NATIONAL  p INSTRUMENTS    LabVIEW    Student Edition       Fig  8  Freeway simulator interface    D  On ramp Simulator    The simplified car following traffic model described earlier  is implemented in the on ramp simulator  There are three  components associated with this application  1  the on ramp  simulation user interface  shown in Figure 9  2  a freeway  layout menu  see Figure 4 right    and 3  a vehicle menu   The simulation interface is used to observe the movement of  vehicles through the on ramp  This component also displays  information related to the simulation  including the phase  state output by th
23. y the time  uncertainty  are those of the smaller cars traveling over a loop  detector at the speed limit  There is a speed limit specified  for the freeway and one for the on ramp  Assuming that    D  D          o  nD  pS  D  oO  5  i   E  a  a  o  N  b  D  o  5  D  R  a  a                      o  N U ha  T T T T x    Number of Iterations  o N A  T T x  f Io  N  i       nN A  f   x    Number of Iterations    3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 138 14 15 16 17 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17    x10  5 ms x10  10ms  r       r r    D  D          S  b    N  N                Number of Iterations  o       5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23    10 50 ms  Ab 4  rae 4  0  5    so 55 56                         Number of Iterations  Oo   N   gt   D    562 53 54  Execution Time  ms     Execution Time  ms     Fig  10  Histograms of Atactua   for multiple simulation runs  60 000  iterations each  using different At    Atactual   Atmax  the propagation of the maximum error  of 16  ms  is shown in Table I  Based on the data collected from  the benchmarking procedure  the uncertainty propagated to  detector signals generated by the simulators is within   16  ms  which when used by the 2070 controller to calculate  velocity would yield a   6 4 mph uncertainty for the freeway  simulator and a   1 5 mph uncertainty for the on ramp  simulator  The   6 4 mph uncertainty in the mainline speed  computations may seem significant  However  it will not  considerably a
    
Download Pdf Manuals
 
 
    
Related Search
    
Related Contents
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION REMOTE CONTROL - Net    Lire un extrait  ANNEXE I RESUME DES CARACTERISTIQUES DU PRODUIT  Aéro Club de Saverne Steinbourg - L`aéro  Lire le mode d`emploi pour recharger vos  OPERATION & SERVICE MANUAL  silex-equipement.com silex-equipement.com silex    Sony SFM1 User's Manual    Copyright © All rights reserved. 
   Failed to retrieve file