Subscriber Handbook
Contents
1. e The timeline also illustrates the nearly seventy year gap in Second Amendment cases presented to the Supreme Court as well as the surge of Second Amendment lawsuits in the last forty years Fastcase Tip Access the Interactive Timeline from Authority Check too When viewing an Authority Check report the Interactive Timeline is minimized so it takes up less room Click the arrow in the top right corner to maximize and view the timeline 9 USING FORECITE When you perform a keyword search on Fastcase Forecite goes the extra mile and identifies important cases that can easily be missed by ordinary keyword searches Forecite enhances your ordinary search result by carefully and comprehensively analyzing the citation structure of each case in your results list It looks for decisions that are frequently cited by other decisions in your search results but do not contain all of your search terms Forecite will notify you of these additional cases at the top of the results page eStart by performing a keyword search eOn the results screen a light orange banner will notify you if Forecite has found additional results based on your search results eClicking on the arrow at the top right hand side will expand the Forecite results Clicking the case name will open the full text of the case Jurisdiction eJ Print List of Results L Authority Check All Jurisdictions AE e T 4 Print Save Documents in Queue Th Enti ese ntire Relevance Case Decis2. e You can select as many courts as you would like and you can select courts across different levels and jurisdictions F Last start Search Results Document Print My Library Options Help Select Junsdictions Recently Searched Junsdictions All Junsdictions WI All Federal Appellate AR All State FL All District Courts All Bankruptcy Courts indvidual Jurisdictions a US Supreme Court and U S Courts of Appeal 4 US District Courts 4 U S Bankruptcy Courts State Supreme and Appeals Courts EO Alabama E Illinois I Montana E Rhode Island E Alaska Indiana E Nebraska E South Carolina E Arizona E lowa E Nevada South Dakota E Arkansas EO Kansas E New Hampshire Tennessee E California E Kentucky E New Jersey E Texas E Colorado Louisiana E New Mexico Utah E Connecticut E Maine E New York E Vermont O Delaware E Maryland E North Carolina Virginia District of Columbia Massachusetts North Dakota Washington E Florida Michigan E Ohio E West Virginia E Georgia E Minnesota E Oklahoma E Wisconsin E Hawaii Mississippi E Oregon E Wyoming E Idaho Missouri EO Pennsylvania Select Al Clear All Searching for Statutes Regulations Constitutions and Court Rules Fastcase also includes statutes regulations court rules and constitutions from nearly all fifty states and the District of Columbia In most cases we have incorporated the content into our database so that yo
3. 285q Chapter 9B Legislative Classification Office sections 286 286g Chapter 9C Office of Parliamentarian of House of Representatives sections 287 287d 3 VIEWING DOCUMENTS View the Full Document Text eAfter you successfully perform a search you are taken to the results screen listing the search results based on your search query eTo access the full text of a document from the search results list click on the blue hyperlinked heading of the document Results Interactive Timeline Jurisdiction 4 Print List of Resu 4 Print Save Docume All Jurisdictions M 4 dto200f8 resuts P A Relevance Case Forecite Fastcase has identified Sadditional decisions that may be relevant to your research to g not contain one or more of your search terms Perlman v Swiss Bank Corp 195 F 3d 975 rth Cir 2000 di January 6 2000 At last we reach the question that occupied central ground in the district court did UNUM make an arbitrary or capricious decision Both Perlman and the district court treat the central issue as whether UNUM correctly understood her abilities in relation to the demands of her job lf Swiss Bank had told Perlman that her performance was unsatisfactory then these would indeed be the right questions UNUM would have needed to determine whether the shortcomings were caused by medical conditions and 2 Pibouin v CA Inc E D M Y 2072 March 31 2012 As to Perlman s comment atthe March
4. aca Lawrar Directors Lan Bias Dockets amp Fiiags Justia Sorin Search Dockets Show outers se 8 judge busted Filed In Ad Federasi Distinct Couts Browse by Manure of Sun Browse by State Type Ad Lowest Types Show Al Case Filngs Oriy Case Filings with Downloadable Options or Orders Contract Prisane Pettiol Cases Filed Al Dates Browse by Type of Lawsuit nce ony Beal Property ure Pen Between 1 l Jer le 2001 and 21 ml May ano x r Ingury f Torts Property O Find a Lawyer Cyt Rights Browse by State ice States Albany Lousars eas Alaska Mare Oregon near Washington D strict of Columble Matang Pennsytvania BLomse Lawyers Arkansas Massachusetts Anode isand unia Michigan S carona Lawyers Get Listed Now Get a tree ful directory profile testing Mnnescss Connechout Mssissips Delamare zut D 4s of Coburnbaa evaGgea Virgina New Hampshire Wastungtor New Jersey West Virginis 11 ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE Customer Support All Fastcase subscribers enjoy access to unlimited customer support Our customer support hours are from 8am to 8pm Eastern time Monday through Friday excluding holidays Whether you have a technical question or need research assistance we re here to help Call us at 1 866 773 2782 email us at support fastcase com or use the LiveChat feature located on our website Training Videos Access our library of training videos at any time at www fastcase com video Our
5. rich text file Print Document Document selected Mickle v Blackmon 255 S C 136 177 S E 2d 548 S C 1970 Highlight search terms Yes No Number of columns 2 v 1 Format Microsoft Word 2007 And Later DOCX r Print Save O Cancel Fastcase Tip WordPerfect users should select Microsoft Word RTF eClick the Print Save link again Your browser will begin to download the file onto your computer eOnce the download is complete open the file using the appropriate application for the file format you selected e Now you can print and or save the file like any other document on your computer Email a Case Fastcase allows you to email a document to any email address with just two clicks eStart by clicking on the Email link on the toolbar when you are viewing a document This will bring you to the Email Document screen Email Document Document selected Mickle v Blackmon 255 S C 136 177 S_E_2d 548 S C 1970 Send Email To noreply fastcase coml Note Emails are sent from noreply fastcase com Add this address to your safe list if you do not receive the email e Fastcase will auto populate the addressee field with the email address associated with your account e Click in the box and type in the new address if sending to someone else e The document you selected will be sent in rich text format within the body of the email e Note You can also download the
6. Dist Bankr sae 1340 1260 1380 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 e Now you can see the court level of each decision y axis Identifying Authoritative Cases By illustrating how relevant each case is based on your search terms how many times each case has been cited by subsequent cases the Interactive Timeline quickly identifies seminal and authoritative cases eFor the best results first make sure that you are in Relevance View e Then look for cases with large diameters that appear towards to the top of the page since frequently cited cases with high relevance scores are the most likely to be authoritative eHere is an illustrative example if you perform a keyword search for second amendment amp arms and open the Interactive Timeline in Relevance View you will see something that looks like this 90 70 50 30 J 9 OGO ee 9 Co EEES 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 elt is easy to spot authoritative cases on the timeline look for circles with large gold and gray diameters as well as circles that appear higher up than other contemporaneous cases eOn the timeline pictured above these four cases all key Second Amendment decisions stand out From left to right 1 Presser v Illinois 116 U S 252 1886 2 United States v Miller 307 U S 174 1939 3 District of Columbia v Heller 554 U S 290 2008 4 McDonald v City of Chicago 130 S Ct 3020 2010
7. 1 2006 meeting the words themselves do not necessarily raise the specter of discriminatory animus Perlman merely states that he hates people with strong accents One need only consider the case of a native born e Your search terms will be highlighted in the text of the case Jurisdiction i Authority Check a Highlight all search terms w 4 Navigate to the previous case next case a PrinthSave Al hrii These results 70 Entire database 167 Find previous term P next term N Jump to the most relevant paragraph M a Add to My Print Queue 40 Add to My Favorites N 4 1to200f84resuts P A ia Email Perlman v Swiss Bank Corp 195 F 3d 975 7th Cir 2000 Perlman v Swiss Bank Corp 195 F 3d 975 7th Cir 2000 Pibouin w CA Inc 667 F Supp 2d 315 E D N Y 2012 ployed Judith Perlman in Chicago as a lawyer until September 1994 i whether she is entitled to disability benefits Perlman has serious m estive system and led to some additional problems such as migraine ili ened ri f t erig 1 he tod ores le es ji 4 Hughes v Life ie Co af North ed Doi efits during that period She took shorter leaves in 19 America 112 F Supp 2d 780 5 D ne a psychiatrist for ind 2000 i Pibouin v CA Inc E D N Y 2012 Robbins w Milliman USA Long Term Disability Ins Plan 1 02 C V 01635 i col n tni le a l i 5 D 4 JDT TAB S D Ind 6 25 2003 S D sh worked full time Swiss Bank was s
8. Ilcs 5 to 310 Ilcs 115 Chapter 315 Urban Problems 315 Ilcs 5 to 315 IIcs 30 Chapter 320 Aging 320 Ilcs 5 to 320 Ilcs 65 3 Chapter 325 Children 325 Ilcs 2 to 325 Ilcs 65 Chapter 330 Veterans and Service Members 330 Ilcs 5 to 330 I 5 Health and Safety Chapter 405 to Chapter 430 6 Agriculture and Conservation Chapter 505 to Chapter 525 7 Transportation Chapter 605 to Chapter 630 8 Rights and Remedies Chapter 705 to Chapter 775 9 Business Chapter 805 to Chapter 820 Chapter men Oh O O O 1S S 0 0 ra cin cn cin g cia ota cin a c s mw g a Chapter 325 Children 325 lics 2 to 325 325 Children 325 llcs 2 to 325 llcs 65 325 Ilcs 2 Abandoned Newborn Infant Protection Ac 325 llcs 17 Children s Privacy Protection and Parent 325 lics 20 Early Intervention Services System Act 325 llcs 27 Afterschool Youth Development Project 325 llcs 30 Family Support Demonstration Project 325 lics 35 Interagency Board for Children who are 325 lics 40 Intergovernmental Missing Child Recove 325 Ilcs 42 Kinship Navigator Act Sec 1 to Sec 99 325 llcs 45 Minor Identification and Protection Act 325 lics 47 Illinois Child Online Exploitation Reporti 325 llcs 57 Find Our Children Act Sec 1 to Sec 99 325 llcs 65 Online Child Safety Act Sec 1 to Sec 325 llcs 5 Abused and Neglected Child Reporting Aq 325 lics 10 Birth Control Services to Minors Act Se 325 llcs 15 Child
9. PERSONALIZED FEATURES Fastcase dynamically tracks what you are searching for and uses this information to tweak your user interface with the goal of making your research more efficient Fastcase also lets you set certain display preferences Recently Searched Jurisdictions Fastcase tracks the jurisdictions you have selected for your searches in two places making it easier to select your most frequently searched jurisdiction e The first time you search there will be just one jurisdiction option under the Quick Caselaw Search box All Jurisdictions eOnce you have run a search where you narrowed your search by jurisdiction the last jurisdiction you selected will start to appear Quick Caselaw Search switch to advanced caselaw search All Jurisdictions SC r e Fastcase will also auto populate the area of the Advanced Caselaw Search page labeled Recently Searched Jurisdictions with the last five jurisdictions that you have selected for your searches Recently Searched Jurisdictions S ct Last 10 Searches e You can find the last ten searches you performed on the Quick Caselaw Search page under the heading Last 10 Searches e The searches are listed according to the search terms you used elf you click on the any of the listed searches you will be taken directly to the corresponding search results Results Document Print My Library Options Help Quick Caselaw Search switch to advanced caselaw sear
10. Sexual Abuse Prevention Act Seq 325 Ilcs 25 High Risk Youth Career Development Aq 325 Ilcs 50 Missing Children Records Act Sec 0 0 325 lics 55 Missing Children Registration Law Sec 325 Ilcs 60 Surgical Institute for Children Act Sec To print the statutes go back to the black menu bar and select Print then View Print Queue All of the individual statutes from the section you added will be in your queue Print Documents Documents selected 225 ILCS 65 1 Short title Illinois Compiled Statutes 2013 Edition 325 ILCS 65 5 Legislative intent Illinois Compiled Statutes 2013 Edition D oy 325 ILCS 65 10 Applicability Illinois Compiled Statutes 2013 Edition 325 ILCS 65 15 Definitions Illinois Compiled Statutes 2013 Edition 225 ILCS 65 20 Parental controls required Illinois Compiled Statutes 2013 Edition 325 ILCS 65 25 Parental controls availability charge Illinois Compiled Statutes 2013 Edition SF i i 325 ILC S 65 99 Effective date Illinois Compiled Statutes 2013 Edition Highlight search terms Number of columns 1 Format Microsoft Word DOC Ea 2 Print Save O Cancel e You will have an opportunity to review the statutes in your print queue To remove a statute from the queue click the printer icon e Make your formatting selections just as you would with a single document e Click the Print Save link Your browser will begin to download the file onto your computer 6
11. court has w directed the ER M wa rial e Ea PU n ha d a Pt ae E hr rn irait RISA plan to paw benefit elman contends that 44 000 is too low itis only a third of her request eAll of your search results will appear on the narrower panel on the left elf you want to highlight a particular search term select the term from the Highlight drop down menu Navigate Within a Document Q Highlight all search terms iw siaiall search terms Use the navigation toolbar to navigate within a document Highlight all search terms Aa A Navigate to the previous case next case Find previous term P next term N Jump to the most relevant paragraph M eJump to the paragraph with the densest concentration of search terms by clicking the most relevant paragraph link Note This feature is currently compatible with Internet Explorer Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox e To search within your case use your browser s find command by pressing Ctrl F eJump to the next search term by clicking the next term link eJump to the previous search term by clicking the previous term link Fastcase Tip These options are also available under the Document menu Copy and Paste If you are using Internet Explorer Fastcase can help you save time drafting legal briefs and other pleadings with two handy copying tools Document Print My Library Go to Next Document Go to Previous Document J
12. meet the requirements of the Confrontation Clause the prosecution must demonstrate that the declarantis unavailable and the statement itself bears adequate indicia of reliability Ohio v Roberts 448 U S 56 65 66 1980 abrogated by Crawford v Washington 541 U S 36 53 54 2004 9 The admissibility of Shah s statements was the subject of an extensive pre trial hearing Fowler 548 S E 2d at 693 Sergeant Anselmo and Investigator Fish each testified that hePage Stanton vw Janda E D Cal 2013 March 1 2013 b Negative treatment indicated in this case ofthe confrontationPage 44requirement unless the prosecution establishes that ithas made a good faith effort to obtain the witness s presence attrial but the witness remains unavailable despite resort to available processes such as the Uniform Act Barber v Page 390 U S 719 723 24 1966 Ohio v Roberts 448 U S 56 74 1980 overruled on another ground Crawford v Washington 541 U S 36 The extent of efforts which the prosecution must undertake to produce a witness is a question of reasonableness Ohio vy Roberts 448 U S at 74 Thus where itis greatly improbable that a 405 Condo Assocs LLC w Greenwich Ins Co SDNY 20712 December 24 2012 Bad Law Bot finds negative citation history by taking all the cases that have cited Roberts and examining how they ve cited to Roberts If a court has negatively cited to Roberts Bad Law Bot will link you to that case Keep
13. peremptory challenges Bulletins 1980 1981 vol 2 U S Sup Ct Bull B2419 i i i 1d Bulletins 1980 1981 vol 2 U S Sup Ct Bul B2419 Irving Jones a black man was convicted of possession of heroin with intent to distribute and was sentenced to fifteen Issue 4 Winter 1997 Age of Unreason The Impact of Reasonableness Increased Police Force and 12 Colordlindness on Terry Stop and Frisk The 50 Okla L Rev 451 1997 Okiahoma Law Review Issue 4 April 1996 Twenty Fifth Annual Review of 1 293 S C 54 358 S E 2d 701 1987 l 13 Criminal Procedure I Investigation and Police 2 In South Carolina a defendant facing serious criminal charges is entitled to ten Practices 84 Geo L J 717 1995 1996 Georgetown peremptory challenges and the state is entitled to five S C Cone Ann 14 7 1110 Law Law Journal i Co op Supp 1987 Search newspapers on NewsLibrary com For help searching NewsLibrary email their customer support team at newslibrary newsbank com More than 182 Million Newspaper Articles from Thousands of Credible U S Publications All In One Location SEARCHING UNITED STATES 3334 title s see a list for advanced search return Best matches first z from all documents z Search Hint Connecting terms with AND narrows your search to give more precise results more on search operators Find any article 3 event or stor NARROW TO select from options below across the U S of Mill
14. that is that no valid judgment can be rendered against such official until his assent and consent to said judgment is shown in his answer to the anana or in the trial of the garnishment case This is what it says and it is an elementary rule of construction that when a it will be held to mean what it clearly expresses Bares v Carter 170 Ga 895 898 48 S E 387 Also see Copy Document Text E App 629 Decatur County v Catledge 173 Ga 656 160 S E 909 Standard Oil Co of Kentucky v State Ti 375 176 S E 1 Where a statute is clear and unambiguous in its terms a court does not have the right to Reven Copy Text i const f arent from what it declares The wisdom of the statute is a matter for consideration by the legislature New Amst si r With Gtation dery 191 Ga 334 337 12 S E 2d 355 and citations t i is only by the provisions of the act of 1945 amending a Eee Co ee eee eae or a e Next open the brief or pleading that you are working on in the appropriate word processing program e g MS Word or Word Perfect e Then use your program s paste function to paste the text into your document If you are using MS Word you can paste using the shortcut CTRL V elf you selected Copy With Citation it will paste the text with the citation at the end ial be entered by default or on said answer or in said garnishment proceedings unless and until such assentand consentto said ju
15. times each case was cited for your search terms diameter of gold circles Select how many cases you d like to view at once and how you d like them sorted Hold your mouse over a bubble to show the case name preview and citation information Click on the case name to access the case A last Start Search Results Document Print My Options Help Results Interactive Timeline Timeline for your search second amendment amp right t dear arms Vertical Axis Relevan w Show 1000 Results Sort By Relevan w Sort Direction Descendi w _ Cites in Entire Database IB Forecite Cites in These R Cites in These Results 90 T0 50 0 _ wd 1840 1560 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 e You can switch to Court Level View by selecting Court Level from the Vertical Axis filter F last Start Search Results Document Print My Library Options Help Results Interactive Timeline Timeline for your search second amendment amp right to bear arms Show 1000 w Results Sort By Relevan w Sa Vertical Axis Court level q Ct EN e This time your timeline will look something like the image below Vertical Axis Court level Show 1000 Results Sort By Relevan Sort Direction Descendi D Cites in Entire Database D Forecite Cites in These Results Cites in These Results f a w lt w ON 4 C of
16. video tutorials cover the basics of researching on Fastcase and address frequently asked questions Online Webinars Sign up for one of our free live online webinar training sessions We offer webinars throughout the year For a complete webinar schedule and online registration visit www fastcase com webinars Reference Guides Check out our FAQs and reference guides on how to use Fastcase View them once download them to your computer or print them for later reference when you have a question Our FAQs www fastcase com faq Full User Guide www fastcase com wp content uploads 2013 08 User Guide pdf Quick Reference Guide www fastcase com wp content uploads 2013 08 Quick Reference pdf
17. 6 100 Ct 2531 65 L Ed 2d 597 2 1980 view document Authority Check is an automated system that identifies later citing cases but it is not a citator and does not include editorial information telling you whether your case is still good law Interactive Timeline Citation Summary Vertical axis what s this W Total number oftimes this case 3 606 a EE has been cited US Supreme Court Cited by federal appellate cases T42 Cited by state cases 2 016 Cited by district court cases 345 District amp Cited by bankruptcy court cases 3 eee ae Decision date of most recent April 11 2013 State cite Federal Appellate 2006 2009 2012 Legend Cites in entire case law database When a court cites a case that has been overturned or reversed even on other grounds the Bluebook T requires that the court indicate the negative history right there in the citation Bad Law Bot reads through ce Bad Law Bot 5 what other courts have said about this case the citations in Fastcase identifying this kind of negative signal information in citations t then reports what other courts have said about this case when citing it flagging negative history reported by the courts The full list of citing cases is below More Fowler v Branker W DALC 2013 March 26 2013 Negative treatment indicated in this case him Crawford v Washington 541 U S 36 42 2004 For the admission of an out of court hearsay statement to
18. Fastcase User Guide for Loislaw Libraries Subscribers l last Smarter legal research As of December 2016 Wolters Kluwer and Fastcase have transitioned the legacy Loislaw platform to Loislaw Libraries on Fastcase The new service combines the must have treatise libraries from Aspen and CCH with Fastcase s extensive libraries of nationwide case law statutes regulations and court rules Best of all it s powered by Fastcase with award winning search tools the Interactive Timeline Bad Law Bot and the most popular smartphone app for lawyers If you re new to Fastcase this guide will be a quick way to get started LEGAL RESEARCH THERE S AN APP FOR THAT Fastcase for iPhone iPad and Android devices Fastcase s free mobile applications use smart search technology from Fastcase s full featured legal research application Mobile technology is the future and the Fastcase App is your best on the go tool putting the law in your hands Get the leading mobile legal technology by downloading Fastcase to your mobile device today Visit www fastcase com iphone www fastcase com ipad or www fastcase com android for more information Visit www fastcase com mobile sync for instructions 10 Ti TABLE OF CONTENTS Getting started Search for documents a Search types b Selecting a jurisdiction c Browsing statutes using Outline View Viewing documents a Navigating within a document b Copy and paste Customiz
19. administering Miranda warnings if the officer has a reasonably articulable suspicion of criminal activity State v Pettit 194 Ariz 192 1 15 979 P 2d 5 8 App 1998 Miranda warnings are only required once a person is subjected to custodial interrogation Miranda 36 4 US at 3 Mbugua w Thaler S D Tex 2012 september 26 2012 Petitioner argues that the facts of this case are materially indistinguishable from the facts in Missouri v Seibert 542 US 600 2004 where police used a question first warn later interrogation tactic Docket Entry No 21 page 5 The facts of Seibert however are markedly distinguishable from the present case Patrice Seibert was awakened at 3 00 a m by a police officer at the hospital where her son was being treated for burns from a fire in which her disabled son had died eOnce you ve clicked on the case you can add the results to your print queue and generate an Authority Check report for each decision 10 TRANSACTIONAL SEARCH OPTIONS Newspapers Legal Forms and Federal Filings Fastcase also provides access to a newspaper archive legal forms and federal filings through our business partners These transactional search options can be found under the Search menu Please be advised that there are additional charges for accessing documents using these transactional search services from our partners Search Law Review Articles and more on HeinOnline Now you can search ev
20. atisfied with her work believes that she is physically and mentally able to continue and contend Ind 2003 sie quit for personal rather than medical reasons seizing an opportunity to leave the labor force and move to the Wisconsin countryside Semien v Life Ins Co of North UNUM Life Insurance Company administers Swiss Bank s disability plan a welfare benefit plan covered by ERISA For short term America 436 F 3d 805 7th Cir sability UNUM acts solely as an administrator payment comes from Swiss Bank s accounts For disability after the first 26 weeks UNUM i Sond th administrator and insurer it pays any award Immediately after quitting Perlman applied for short term benefits After seeking and coi a pi a i ovided do not prevent you from performing the material duties of your occupation Perlman appealed to a higher level of UNUM s staff but Md 2008 as unsuccessful A letter in July 1995 explained We do not see a change in your medical condition which necessitated you to stop work he records do not show a level of impairment which would restrict or limit you from performing the duties of your regular job given that you Doe v Mamsi Life and Health Ins worked with these conditions in the past Co 448 F Supp 2d 179 D D C 2006 section 502 a 1 B of ERISA 29 U S C sec 1132 a 1 B makes decisions of this kind reviewable in federal court and Perlman asked the district judge to direct UNUM to pay both short and lo
21. by district court cases 0 District amp s a 1 Bankruptcy I Cited by bankruptcy court cases State D o 0o00 O Decision date of most recent cite June 11 2008 1981 1985 1989 1993 1997 2001 2005 Legend Cites in entire case law database Jurisdiction Citing Cases All Jurisdictions v 4 4 1to 34 of34 results P P J 41 Linstroth v Dorgan 2 S0 3d 305 Fla App 2008 June 11 2N alimony payments which had been established by previous court 2 So 3d 312 order were terminated by the remarriage Also 5 barred is any facet of periodic or lump sum alimony which is predicated on the need to support the wife Friedman v Schneider 52 So 2d 420 Fla 1951 Where the periodic payments represent only J 2 Efron v Efron 813 So 2d 209 Fla App 2002 April 3 2002 distribution and permanent alimony are resolved As an illustration in a divorce proceeding it will sometimes happen that a Authority Check is not a citator it does NOT include editorial information telling you whether a case is still good law and it does NOT check for subsequent cases overruling your case We recommend that you use an editorial citator such as Shepard s via Lexis Nexis or KeyCite via Westlaw that indicates whether a case is still good law Identify Frequently Cited Cases eOn the results page the number to the right of each case under the Authority Check heading corresponds to the number of
22. can use Authority Check in many ways including eTo generate a list of later citing cases to find related authority on your topic e TO prioritize your research by identifying the most frequently cited cases within your list of results Generate a List of Later Citing Cases eStart by pulling up the case you are interested in Make sure you are on the page with the full text of the case e The hyperlinked Entire database number under the Authority Check heading top left side corresponds to the number of times the case has been cited in the Fastcase database eClick on the hyperlinked Entire database number to generate the Authority Check Report with a list of later citing cases The report will load in a new tab or window within your browser Document Print My Library Options L Authority Check These results 16 Entire database Authority Check Report Generated on January 16 2013 Claughton v Claughton 393 So 2d 1061 Fla 1980 view document 2 Print Report Authority Check is an automated system that identifies later citing cases but it is not a citator and does not include editorial information telling you whether your case is still good law Interactive Timeline Citation Summary ee what s this W Total number of times this case 34 Matoa sat has been cited Vertical axis US Supreme Court Cited by federal appellate cases 0 Cited by state cases 33 Federal Appellate Cited
23. case using the Print Save button and then email it as an attachment Batch Retrieval and Printing Cases e Batch printing allows you to download and print up to fifty documents as a single document e To add a case to your Print Queue from the results page click on the printer icon to the left of the case 14 In re M555 Inc 440 B R 806 Bankr Cola 2009 1 The Trustee s amended complaint asserted claims against GD C for 1 breach of fiduciary duty 2 legal malpractice fraud and 6 claim disallowance Based on is in pan delicto affimative defense this Court entered summary judgment summary judgment on the sich claim Thereafter the LLC 440 B R 178 Bankr 5 D N Y 2005 In pan delicto on the other hand is an equitable defense to liability Food Holdings Lid w Bank of America Com In r similar but acknowledging distinctions The doctrine is a state law equitable defense similar to the unclean hands doctri _ a e When you click the printer icon the plus sign will change to a minus sign This means that the case has been added to your print queue e You can add up to 50 total documents to your print queue at a time e To print select View Print Queue from the Print dropdown menu Start Search Results Document Results interactive Timeline a Jurisdiction lt 4 Print Results View Print Queue My Library Options Help e You will have an opportunity to revi
24. ch All Jurisdictions Start a New Search Last 10 Searches Help Options Advanced Caselaw Sgarch ledbetter v goodyear FAQs Search Statutes automobile exception B User Guide good faith exception Search Regulations B Tutorials doctrine of plain view Search Constitutions Live Chat My Library Recently Viewed Documents e Fastcase automatically tracks the last fifty documents that you have viewed and automatically stores them in your personalized library for easy access e To retrieve the fifty most recent documents you viewed select Go to Recent Documents from the My Library menu fast Start Search Results Document Print My Library Options Help Go to Recent Documents My Library Go to Favorite Documents Recent Documents Favorite Documents State v Pride 1 S W 3d 494 Mo W D 1999 Roe v Wade 410 U S 113 93 S Ct 705 35 L Ed 2d 147 1973 Republic National Bank of Miami v United States 113 S Ct 554 121 L Ed 2d 474 506 U S 80 1992 Honig v Doe 484 U S 305 108 S Ct 592 98 L Ed 2d 686 1988 Doe v Bolton 8212 40 410 U S 179 93 S Ct 739 35 L Ed 2d 201 1971 Favorite Documents e Fastcase allows you to save up to fifty documents for later reference e To save a document click the Add to My Favorites link on toolbar at the top right e To retrieve your saved documents select Go to Favorite Documents from the menu Hi
25. dgmentis shown in said answer or in the trial of the garnishment case This language is clear and unambiguous and in our opinion can mean but one thing and that is that no valid judgment can be rendered against such official until his assent and consentto said judgmentis shown in his answer to the garnishmentor in the trial of the garnishment case This is what it says and it is an elementary rule of construction that when a statute is clear and unambiguous it will be held to mean what it clearly expresses Barnesv Carter 120 Ga 895 898 48 S E 387 Also see Board of Tax Ass Redwine v Morgan 88 Ga App 625 77 5 E 2d 330 Ga App 1953 4 CUSTOMIZING YOUR CASELAW SEARCH RESULTS Cases Fastcase gives you nearly complete control over the way your caselaw search results are displayed You can filter your results by jurisdiction sort your results six different ways and determine how much summary information will be displayed about each case Filter Case Results by Jurisdiction e Easily filter your results down to cases from one jurisdiction using the Jurisdiction dropdown menu eThe menu will contain only jurisdictions that are represented in your search results elf you see a jurisdiction listed on the filter there is at least one case associated with that jurisdiction in your search results Fos PNI Start Search Results Document Print My Library Options Help Results Interactive Timeline All Jurisdic
26. e Statutes Using Outline View In addition to searching Fastcase also allows you to browse the integrated codes in our Outline View format eTo get started go to the Search Statutes page then click the tab labeled Browse Search Statutes Browse Search Type Keyword Search Boolean Natural Language Citation e This will display the statute or code you selected in an expandable outline format eClick the plus sign to expand any level and scroll up and down to find the section you are looking for Search Statutes Search Browse z United States Code _ United States Code 2011 Edition 4 Title 1 General Provisions Chapter 1 to Chapter 3 Tite 2 The Congress Chapter 1 to Chapter 31 i Chapter 1 Election of Senators and Representatives sections 1 9 Chapter 2 Organization of Congress sections 21 30b hapter 3 Compensation and Allowances of Members sections 31 59h pter 4 Officers and Employees of Senate and House of Representatives sections 60 1301 _ napter 5 Library of Congress sections 131 185 Chapter 6 Congressional and Committee Procedure Investigations sections 190 199 Chapter 7 Contested Elections sections 201 226 a Chapter 8 Federal Corrupt Practices sections 241 256 4 Chapter 8A Regulation of Lobbying sections 261 270 E Chapter 9 Office of Legislative Counsel sections 271 282e Chapter 9A Office of Law Revision Counsel sections 285
27. e score is displayed in the far left hand column on the results page under the heading Relevance e The purpose of the Fastcase Relevance score is to tell you which documents on your list of search results are more likely to contain a substantive discussion of the search terms you entered The higher the percentage the more likely that the document contains a substantive discussion of the topic e By default your search results will be displayed in the relevance score order meaning the case with the highest relevance score is at the top of the list Results Interactive Timeline Jurisdiction lt j Print List of Results ix Authority Check All Jurisdictions M40 1to20of82resuts P M ETE AN ene ee Enti a ese ntire Relevance Case Decision Date Results Database actcase has identified Sadditional decisions that may be relevant to your research topic but do not contain one or more of your Search terms View Results Imp 1 Perlman v Swiss Bank Corp 195 F 3d 975 th Cir 2000 January 6 2000 69 154 At last we reach the question that occupied central ground in the district court did UNUM make an arbitrary or capricious decision Both Perlman and the district court treat the central issue as whether UNUM correctly understood her abilities in relation to the demands of her job lf Swiss Bank had told Perlman that her performance was unsatisfactory then these would indeed be the right questions UNUM would have needed to determine whe
28. edical conditions and At last we Both Pef demand question 2 Pibouf March 31 2012 As to Perlman s comment atthe March 1 2006 meeting the words themselves do not necessarily raise the specter of discriminatory animus Perlman merely states that he hates people with strong accents One need only consider the case of a native born You may also make your sorting selection from the Results menu eTo sort results by Relevance score select Relevance eTo sort in chronological order select Decision Date eTo sort in alphabetical order select Case Name eTo sort by the number of subsequent citations select Entire Database eTo sort by the number of subsequent citations within your search results select These Results e To sort your cases in order of court hierarchy select Court Hierarchy Results Document Print My Library Options View Results Jurisdiction Relevance Cleat Show Titles Only Case Name ee Show First Paragraph Decision Date i ae Show Most Relevant Paragraph Cited in These Results Ve Bt ONT Tome OTT Tato 3 police intermogated him and three days Cited in Entire Database counsel when after police had questi Court Hierarchy F Cesnene ce Olend AGI Cc OO p Fastcase Relevance Score e Fastcase s smart search technology assigns a relevance score 0 100 to each document in your search results based on the search terms used in the query e Th
29. ery law review article ever written in America with the HeinOnline collection on Fastcase Search for free view results for free subscribe at a discount to view any law review article Fastcase suggests relevant law review articles with search results too You can subscribe to Hein for as little as a day or monthly or annually Fastcase Home Contact Info Help and Support Logout Search Results Document Print My Library Options Welcome Ed Walters Results Highlight all search terms C3 Open PDF to Print Save WN 4 Page 1 3 DD LQ Find previous term P next term N Jump to the most relevant paragraph M I Add to My Library HEINONLINE 4 4 1to 20 of 188 results P P Bulletin 1989 1990 vol 2 U S Sup Ct Bull B2377 Issue 1 Autumn 1988 Annual Survey of South Carolina i c 1al Law 40 S C L Rev 41 1988 1989 South Carolina Law 1989 1990 United States Supreme Court Bulletin Law nmina 9 Bulletin 1984 1985 vol 1 U S Sup Ct Bull B1 CRIMINAL LAW 1984 1985 United States Supreme Court Bulletin 1 Bulletin 1982 1983 vol 1 U S Sup Ct Bull B1 3 1982 1983 United States Supreme Court Bulletin I NATURE OF PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES ALTERED Issue 1 Autumn 1988 Annual Survey of South a C in w Criminal 40 5 C Rev EOD LARA ine CAAA ria __In State v Jones the South Carolina Supreme Court sim plified the process of challenging racially discriminatory peremp Issue 2 June 1975 Annua
30. ew the cases in your print queue To remove a case from the queue click the printer icon e Make your formatting selections just as you would with a single case e Click the Print Save link Your browser will begin to download the file onto your computer Batch Printing Statutes From the Outline View click on the main group of statutes you want to print Below in the Outline View for the Illinois Compiled Statutes we selected 4 Human Needs then clicked the plus sign to the left of the title to see it see the chapters contained in it We then clicked on the title name not the plus sign Chapter 325 Children to bring up the different sections within the chapter on the right hand side To add any of the sections to your print queue just click the printer icon to the left of the individual statute When the section has been added the plus sign on the icon will turn into a minus sign You can add up to 50 total documents to your print queue ata time Q Highlight all search terms l Navigate to the previous Find previous term P next term N Jump to the most releva Results Outline View Illinois Compiled Statutes Illinois Compiled Statutes 2013 Edition 1 Government Chapter 5 to Chapter 75 2 Education Chapter 105 to Chapter 115 3 Regulation Chapter 205 to Chapter 240 4 Human Needs Chapter 305 to Chapter 330 Chapter 305 Public Aid 305 Ilcs 5 to 305 Ilcs 60 Chapter 310 Housing 310
31. ghlighting Search Terms e By default Fastcase highlights each of your search terms when you view the full text of a document But you can turn highlighting off by clicking Highlight Search Terms from the ar al I Document menu EEE ee Go to Frevious Document Use Inflection is another option on the Document menu and it also controls the highlighting function When Use Inflection is enabled regular plural forms of your search terms will be highlighted as well For example if one of your search terms is Copy Document to Clipboard vehicle the word vehicles will be highlighted as well i i Jump to Most Relevant Paragraph H Highlight Search Terms Note This feature is currently compatible with Internet Explorer Google Chrome roe and Mozilla Firefox eOnce you activate these features they will remain active for future searches until you deactivate them Reset Preferences e To clear the personalization settings for your account select Reset Application Settings from the Options menu This will clear your Favorite Documents and Recently Searched Jurisdictions and it will return the highlighting feature to its default settings Your Last 10 Reset application settings Searches or your Recently Viewed Documents will not be cleared Change Password 7 USING AUTHORITY CHECK Overview Authority Check is Fastcase s integrated citation analysis tool You
32. in mind that Bad Law Bot determines negative case history by using algorithms and that it is not intended to be a complete replacement for a full editorial citator or for reading all later citing cases A red flag means that there s likely negative treatment since a court has said as much by their use of a negative citation but no red flag does not necessarily mean that a case is still good law If a case has been overturned but no court opinion has cited to it yet Bad Law Bot won t be able to find any citation signal information 8 USING THE INTERACTIVE TIMELINE The Interactive Timeline is a powerful data visualization tool unique to Fastcase By allowing you to view up to four different attributes of each case at a time your search results jump off the page Reading the Timeline eTo access the Interactive Timeline start by running a search and viewing your list of search results On the results page click the Interactive Timeline tab at the top of the screen Document Print My Library e The timeline will open on your screen By default your timeline will open in Relevance View eEach case in your search results is represented on the Interactive Timeline by a gray circle e The Interactive Timeline tells you at least four things about each case e The date of each decision x axis e The Relevance score of each decision y axis e The number of times each case was cited overall diameter of gray circles e The number of
33. ing your caselaw search results a Filtering by jurisdiction b Sorting case results c Relevance score Printing amp Downloading a Printing a single document b Batch printing Personalized features a Recently searched jurisdictions b Last ten searches c My Library Using Authority Check Using the Interactive Timeline Using Forecite Transactional search options Additional assistance 1 GETTING STARTED Logging In e Log in to Fastcase by visiting www fastcase com and clicking Sign In in the top right hand corner Sign in with your e mail address as your username and the password you chose during registration Personalized Start Page Your research begins on a personalized start page called the Quick Caselaw Search page On this page you will find your recent search history hyperlinks to all of our integrated and transactional search options as well as our customer support and training resources You can always navigate back to this page by selecting My Research Home from the Start menu ase Home Contact Info Help and Support Logout Start Search Results Document Print My Library Options Help Quick Caselaw Search switch to advanced caselaw search cy n e 2 AllJurisdictions CA Start a New Search Last 10 Searches Help Options Advanced Caselaw Search FAQs Search Statutes B User Guide Quick Caselaw Search Quickly pull up a case you already have in mind using Quick Casela
34. ion Date Results Database Forecite Fastcase has identified 3 additional decisions that may be relevant to your research topic but do not contain one or more of your search terms l Cited Cited Within Generally Miranda v State of Arizona Vignera v State of New York Westover v United States State of California v 59 June 13 1956 90 36 672 Stewart 212 761 584 384 U S 436 36 S Ct 1602 16 L Ed 2d 694 10 A LR 3d 974 1966 ial Oregon v Elstad 470 U S 298 84 LEd 2d 222 105 5 Ct 1285 1985 March 4 1985 Missouri v Seibert 542 U S 600 159 L Ed 2d 643 2004 June 28 2004 Expand all results What s Forecite 32 1 Rodriguez v State Tex 2012 October 4 2012 rights Appellant signed exhibit fifty two When defense counsel asked Corporal Casas D id he appellant indicate to you not only that he had read them Miranda warnings but that he had understood them he said Yes He acknowledged that he understood them When defense counsel asked him Did he appellant initial by each and every one ofthose Miranda Warnings he said Yes he did When asked A fter the defendant was read his Miranda Warnings and indicated that he 2 otate v Cruz Ariz App 2012 September 28 2012 T Second Cruz also has failed to establish that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to Suppress his first statement A police officer has authority to detain and question a person without
35. ions of full text news articles Google Local Advertising Promote Your Local Listing Using f Easy Low Cost Advertising Now Google com help tags Washington DC Coupons Daily Deals on DC s Best Spas Restaurants amp More 50 90 ofm Search legal forms on U S Legal Forms For help searching U S Legal forms call their customer support team at 877 389 0141 US Legal Forms from Fastcase Legal Forms amp Documents Legal Forms drafted to comply with the laws of your State are available here Most forms are available for downloading in Word format Free form descriptions previews and law summaries are available You may search or use the form list below We recommend viewing the list below before searching Over 36 000 legal documents are available Don t trust generic forms Use the forms professionals trust Form Packages Home Sales Package Corporate Records Maintenance Package Landlord Tenant Package Incorporate Your Business Personal Planning Package LLC Formation Divorce Packages Bankruptcy Package ALL FORM PACKAGES Search Legal Forms Select your State x All Legal Form Packages Landlord Tenant Forms All Affidavits Lead Paint Disclosure Forms Application Forms Lease Addendums Assignment of Contract Lease Amendment Search federal filings on Justia com For help searching Justia call their Filings amp Dockets team at 650 810 1994
36. l Survey of South Carolina 2 A 5 Law Part I Criminal Law 27 S C L Rev 363 tory challenges The court shelved the cumbersome analytic 197 7 h rolin Review sail ie a icp lie framework described in Batson v Kentucky in favor of a Manic E VA MOA SAA AE bright line test The defendant s burden of showing evidence of 6 Development in the Federal Courts The 18 W St U L the prosecutor s purposeful discrimination is removed from the ev 6 Western State University Law Review Batson analysis South Carolina s rule meets the minimal consti Bulletins 1972 1973 vol 2 U S Sup Ct Bull B 2201 tutional requirements set forth in Batson In addition the pro EN O ee ee phylactic approach eliminates strains on judicial resources The g Bulletin 1990 1991 vol 1 U S Sup Ct Bull B1 supreme court also established a strict and easily implemented 1990 1991 United States Supreme Court Bulletin remedy for a Batson violation Trial co t now ill replace im Bulletins 1982 1983 vol 2 U S Sup Ct Bull B2381 3 Go 9 1982 1983 linden Sates mesa patie Bulletin properly challenged jurors on the venire and begin the jury se eee Seems lection process de novo The risk of seating a hostile juror one ssue 1 roject District o olumbia Court of TEE Appasia Project on Criminal Procedure 26 Howerd L3 previously challenged on racial grounds should discourage solic OPP Rea Cee ent JOUA itors from exercising illegal
37. lief for nontenants or uninvit tenant was merely an uninvited person at a party the Kansas Residential Landlord nst the defendants Because the plaintiff brought up this issue in response Donstr LLC v Nation 171 Wash _ 157 286 P 3d 979 Wash 2012 that Landis had to proceed under the Residential Landlord Tenant Act and give her V before suing for 171 Wash App 162 breach of contract She argues that the Reside n law remedies Sort Case Results to Suit Your Needs eYou have complete control over the way your search results are displayed Choose the results view that is best suited to your research project by clicking on the heading for the column that you would like to sort by Results Interactive Timeline Jurisdiction All Jurisdictions Relevance Case Wied 3additional decisions that may be relevant to your research topic but do not contain one or more of your search terms lt 4 Print List of Results M 4 1 to 20 0f 82 results P Pi lt 4 Print Save Documents in Queue View Results mp 69 154 Forecite Fastcase has id amp a 100 1 Perlman Bank Corp 195 F 3d 975 7th Cir 2000 January 6 2000 intral ground in the district court did UNUM make an arbitrary or capricious decision entral issue as whether UNUM correctly understood her abilities in relation to the erlman that her performance was unsatisfactory then these would indeed be the right ermine whether the shortcomings were caused by m
38. na j Ohio j Arizona j Maine j Oklahoma tj Arkansas j Maryland 4 Oregon tj California j Massachusetts j Pennsylvania tj Colorado j Michigan j Rhode Island tj Connecticut j Minnesota tj South Carolina j Delaware j Mississippi HO South Dakota District of Columbia 4 Missouri HU Tennessee j Florida j Montana HU Texas j Georgia j Nebraska tj Utah j Hawaii j Nevada 4 Vermont j Idaho tj New Hampshire hl Virginia j lllingis j New Jersey tj Washington j Indiana j New Mexico West Virginia tj lowa j New York HOU Wisconsin 62 Select All Clear All Archived Editions Regulations constitutions and court rules Click on the bolded hyperlinks to select content that is integrated and searchable within Fastcase Non bolded hyperlinks lead to the official versions of non integrated content which are not searchable within Fastcase Court Rules Federal Virginia Eastern Dist Court Missouri 1st Circuit Virginia Western Dist Court Montana 2nd Circuit State N 3rd Circuit A Nebraska 4th Circuit Alabama Nevada 5th Circuit Alaska New Hampshire 6th Circuit Arizona New Jersey 7th Circuit Arkansas New Mexico Sth Circuit Arkansas Code of Judicial Conduct New York 9th Circuit Arkansas Rules of Professional Conduct NM Dist Court North Carolina Eastern Dist Court C North Carolina North Carolina Middle Dist Court California North Carolina ellate Court Rules North Carolina Western Dist Court Colorado North Dak
39. ng For the purposes of search length a Boolean operator counts as a word CITATION LOOKUP ePull up a case using the reporter citation by entering the reporter volume number the reporter abbreviation and the first page number e This type of search works in both Quick Caselaw Search and Advanced Caselaw Search Enter this part of the citation 431 2004 357 S C First page Reporter Reporter no volume no abbreviation Sloan v Sanford NATURAL LANGUAGE SEARCH Natural language searches are much less precise than Keyword searches but they are good place to start if you are new to legal research or if you are delving into a new area of the law There are a few important aspects of a natural language search that you should bear in mind e The results are the cases with the highest relevance scores based on your overall mix of search terms e Your search results may not contain each and every one of your search terms SELECT A SPECIFIC JURISDICTION FOR YOUR SEARCH eScroll down to the middle of the Advanced Caselaw Search page to the heading Select Jurisdiction eSelect one of the groups of jurisdictions listed or to specify a specific court or state select Individual Jurisdictions e Expand any category under Individual Jurisdictions by clicking on the plus sign States are listed under the State Supreme and Appeals Courts category e Check the box next to the name of the state or court you wish to select
40. ng term disability benefits The court concluded that it was authorized to consider Trustmark Insurance Company both short and long term claims even though Perlman had sought only short term benefits from UNUM because an award of short term ee eee ee benefits is a condition to receipt of long term benefits the parties disagree about whether Perlman is disabled not the duration of any disability 99 1081 C TK S D Ind 6 2 2003 i In m 1007 S D Ind 2003 979 F Supp T26 731 n 6 N_D Ill 1997 es Sun Lae Fiance After stating that UNUM s decision was arbitrary and capriciou g because it failed to obtain the as sistance of any outside experts and Nisinbuloe ine 526 F Supp 2d did not perform a detailed study of Perlman s job duties the judge directed UNUM to reconsider Perlman s application in light of the analysis in 862 N D II 2007 its opinion Both sides have appealed UNUM because it believes that its decision should have been sustained Perlman because she believes that the court should have ordered UNUM to pay benefits without giving it an opportunity to compile a better record A second set of cross Berg v Bcs Financial Corp 372 appeals concerms attorneys fees The district court held that Perlman is the prevailing party and ordered UNUM to pay 44 020 under 29 F Supp 2d 1060 N D N 2005 U S C sec 1132 g 1 990 F Supp 1039 N D III 1995 UNUM now contends that an award of fees is impermissible until after the
41. ota 10th Circuit Connecticut o 11th Circuit D Ohio D C Circuit Delaware Oklahoma Federal Circuit District of Columbia Oregon Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure F Oregon Supplementary Local Rules Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Florida Oregon Uniform Trial Court Rules Federal Rules of Civil Procedure G P Search within a Statute Regulation Constitution or Court Rule Search within the document set that you selected by keyword natural language or citation just as you would search for caselaw eHere the United States Code has been selected and the search terms can be entered into the search box F last Start Search Results Document Frint My Library Options Help Search Statutes Search Browse Search Type Keyword Search Boolean Natural Language Citation Lookup Show Search Tips Syntax Example click to run a search Result AND amp limited AND government documents with both the words OR taxation OR representation documents with either the word NOT executive NOT corporate documents with the word exec i vote OR ballot AND election order of operations documents 4 Supreme Court documents containing the exact wig 4 election w 4 vote documents in which the word e n mitig wildcard documents containing advis r single letter wildcard docume Select Statutes Current Editions E Kansas F North Dakota United States Code 2011 Edition infos 4 E Kentucky 4 E Oklahoma Brows
42. rt Logout Start Search Results Document Print My Library Options Help Results Interactive Timeline Jurisdiction S Pri Print List of Results All Jurisdictions I 4 1 to 1 of 1 results gt a Search Within g Print Save a aes i mad a 3 o onty Chec Relevance Case Decision Date These Results Entire Database j 100 1 P Ohio v Roberts 448 U S 56 100 S Ct 2531 65 L Ed 2d 597 1980 June 25 1980 0 3 606 This case presents issues concerning the constitutional propriety of the introduction in evidence of the preliminary hearing testimony of a witness not produced atthe defendant s subsequent state criminal trial Once you click through to Roberts you ll also notice that there s a red flag in the Authority Check area Search Results Document Print My Library Options Jurisdiction Authority Check A Highlight all search terms All Jurisdictions These results 0 Entire database 3 606 Find prewious tenm P next term N Negative treatment indicated M 4 lto loflresults P Pi Ohio v Roberts 448 U S 56 100 S Ct Ohio v Roberts 448 2531 65 L Ed 2d 597 1980 To see the cases that indicate negative citation history for Roberts simply click on the Negative Treatment Indicated link and the Authority Check report will open in a new tab Here s what the Authority Check report looks like for Roberts Authority Check Report Generated on April 23 2013 a Ohio v Roberts 448 U S 5
43. t contain the word l 1 car Results must contain the word capital within 3 words of the word punishment You must specify a number for how far apart the terms may found Results must contain some variation of the stem litig such as litigation litigated litigator etc The works as a single letter wildcard Results must contain some variation of the word advis_r such as adviser or advisor Results must contain the precise phrase felony murder Parentheses are used to define the order of operations when you use multiple Boolean operators The operators are also available in the Show Search Tips box in the Advanced Caselaw Search page Here are a few more things to keep in mind when you are performing a keyword search on Fastcase e Our search engine automatically omits certain common words e g the it etc from your query The search runs more efficiently without these common noise words e Fastcase uses an implied AND operator This means that if there are multiple words in your search query and you do not specify a Boolean operator to connect them Fastcase will treat your search as if you had placed an AND between each term For example if you type summary judgment order Fastcase will read that as summary AND judgment AND order Only cases containing ALL of those terms will be returned as results e At the moment our search engine will accommodate a search up to 500 words lo
44. ther the shortcomings were caused by medical conditions and 2 Pibouin v CA Inc E D NL 2012 March 31 2012 As to Perlman s comment atthe March 1 2006 meeting the words themselves do not necessarily raise the specter of discriminatory animus Perlman merely states that he hates people with strong accents One need only consider the case of a native born 5 PRINTING amp DOWNLOADING DOCUMENTS Fastcase gives you the ability to save and print clean professional looking documents in single or dual column format Printing a Single Document eClick the Print Save link on your toolbar ment Print My Library Options Help Lr Authonty Check q Highlight all search terms 4 Navigate to the previous case next case These results 0 Entire database 18 Find previous tenn P next term N Jump to the most relevant paragraph M W Add to My Favorites w Email nt Queue Mickle v Blackmon 255 5 C 136 177 5 E 2d 548 5 C 1970 Page 548 177 S E 2d 548 255 S C 136 Janet MICKLE Appellant Y Larry Wayne BLACKMON Cherokee Incorporated and Ford Motor Company of whichFord Motor Company is Respondent No 19120 Supreme Court of South Carolina e Make your formatting selections e Choose whether to highlight search terms e Choose single or dual column formatting e Choose a file format Microsoft Word DOC Adobe Acrobat PDF or Microsoft Word RTF
45. times the case has been subsequently cited in other cases Case Decision Date ese Results Entire Databas 1 District of Columbia w Heller 128 5 Ct 2783 171 L Ed 2d 637 2008 June 26 2008 94 142 tis particulary wrongheaded to read Miller for more than what it said because the case did not even purport to be a thorough examination of the Second Amendment JUSTICE STEVENS claims Weep post at 42 that the opinion reached its conclusion ajRter reviewing many of the same sources that are discussed at greater length by the Court today Not many which was not entirely the Court s I e Peer ar Tae a i aT ili aarm mla nean Pe r zma L ata ri E alaf mir eSort the most frequently cited cases overall to the top of the list by clicking on the heading Entire Database eSort the cases most frequently cited by other cases in your search results to the top of the list by clicking on the heading These Results Identify Negative Citation History The Bluebook requires that courts indicate negative history of cases cited within opinions The Fastcase Bad Law Bot takes advantage of this data by using algorithms to find these negative citation histories then flags those cases and provides links to those cases Here we looked up Ohio v Roberts 448 U S 56 Note the red flag next to the case name indicating negative citation history for the case GC a last Fastcase Home Contact Info Help and Suppo
46. tions Federal 4th Circuit A Federal 6th Circuit Federal 7th Circuit Federal 9th Circuit Federal 11th Circuit Federal D C Circuit Alabama Southern District Court Alaska District Court Arizona District Court Florida Middle District Court M d 1to200of477 results P P 4 Print List of Results 4 Print Save Documents in Queue pnal decisions that may be relevant to your research topic but do not contain one or mc cis cis wg Florida Southern District Court Hawaii District Court Illinois Northern District Court Indiana Southern District Court lowa Northern District Court lowa Southern District Court Kansas District Court Maryland District Court Mississippi Southern District Court New York Eastern District Court Oklahoma Western District Court Oregon District Court South Carolina District Court Virginia Eastern District Court Washington Western District Court Connecticut Bankruptcy Court Illinois Northern Bankruptcy Court Montana Bankruptcy Court 103 Wn 2d 542 693 P 2d 108 Wash 1985 idential landlord tenant problems are within the express purview of the Residential nd we perceive the legislature s intent to clearly be that violations of that act do not also n Act RCW 19 86 We reverse the trial court h 203 P 3d 68 41 Kan _ 2d 540 Kan 2009 tndants contend the plaintiff s petition made no allegations about the Kansas Residenti perly before us Second in their view the Act provides no re
47. u can browse and search the relevant statute regulation court rule or constitution within Fastcase In some cases Fastcase provides hyperlinks to the free official versions of these resources from the Web as a convenience for our subscribers Collecting them all in one place allows you to find these resources quickly without having to search for them each time Select a Type of Document e Begin your search by selecting the type of document you want to search from the Search menu or the Start a New Search panel on the Quick Caselaw Search page Results Document Print My Library Options Help Search Cases Search Statutes Search Regulations Quick Caselaw Search Search Constitutions Search Court Rules All Jurisdictions Search Attomey General Opinions Search Newspapers Search Federal Filings Search Legal Forms Search Statutes a Search Regulations E Search Constitutions E Search Court Rules Statutes eNext select a jurisdiction for the type of document you would like to search The integrated statutes within Fastcase are on the left and have check boxes next to each jurisdiction s name Select the jurisdiction s you want to search by clicking on the check box On the right is a list of hyperlinks that lead to our non integrated content Select Statutes Current Editions tj United States Code iH Kansas tj North Carolina Li Wyoming j Alabama j Kentucky tj North Dakota tj Alaska j Louisia
48. ump to Most Relevant Paragraph Copy Document to Clipboard Copy tation to Clipboard 4f Highlight Search Terms Use Inflection E Print Document Email Document e Copy the text of the document you are viewing to your clipboard by selecting Copy Document to Clipboard from the Document menu Or e Copy the citation for the document you are viewing to your clipboard by selecting Copy Citation to Clipboard from the Document menu e Next open the brief or pleading that you are working on in the appropriate word processing program e g MS Word or Word Perfect e Then use your program s paste function to paste the text into your document If you are using MS Word you can paste using the shortcut CTRL V If you want to copy just a portion of a case use our Copy Document Text feature e While in the case view select the text you want to copy with your mouse ePlace your mouse at the beginning of the text you want to copy and click and hold the mouse button Drag your mouse to the end of the selection and then release the button The selected text will be highlighted in blue eA pop up box will give you the choice of copying the text or copying the text with the case citation Page 333 not to be extended beyond its terms and provisions Weston v Beverly 10 Ga App 2617 1 73 S E 404 Few vw Pou 32 Ga App 620 2 124 SE 3 2 Hartsfield Co v Zakas Bakery 50 GaApp 284 177 S E 625 but one thing and
49. w Search Use a case citation or enter in a keyword search Q uick Caselaw Search switch to advanced caselaw search All Jurisdictions OR For more involved research projects go directly to Advanced Caselaw Search Advanced Caselaw Search Advanced Caselaw Search is our full featured search function From there you can perform three different types of searches Keyword Search Natural Language Search or Citation Lookup 2 SEARCH FOR DOCUMENTS Searching for Caselaw There are three ways to search for cases on Fastcase by Keyword Natural Language or Citation Lookup Advanced Caselaw Search Search Type Keyword Search Boolean Natural Language Citation Lookup KEYWORD SEARCH with Boolean operators Searching by Keyword using Boolean operators is the most powerful and flexible way to search for electronic information It is also very easy to use Fastcase uses the standard Boolean operators described below OPERATOR EXAMPLE DESCRIPTION AND amp OR NOT w 3 3 u m copyright AND preemption landlord OR lessor vehicle NOT car capital w 3 punishment litig advis r felony murder security OR pledge AND assignment Results must contain both the words copyright and preemption Results must contain either the word landlord or the word lessor They may contain both words Results must contain the word vehicle but must no
Download Pdf Manuals
Related Search