Title 条件の異なるスクワット動作遂行中の下肢の運動学的 解析 Author(s)
Contents
1. 19 WW 92. KBE FS NS NS BS BS NS FS D 10 19 5 487 490 1992 2 30 1 8 13 2003 3 PT 35 379 386 2001 4
3. MVC NS 2596 FS 15 BS 3596 C Ak 6 BS 2 MVC 3 MVC 9
4. A MVC 6 7 3 3 NS 1 09 FS 1 07 BS 0 85 NS 0 40 FS 0 42 BS 0 23 CH 3 BS NS FS NS FS BS
5. 8 5
6. 40 50 S9 2
7. BS NS FS 2 MVC DAL KREMT 9 0 14 2 21 1 28 49 18 4 21 8 T 30 12 3 12 2 15 6 9 496 10 6 15 6 8 19 10 9 17 7
8. BS NS FS 50 NS FS 1 0 4 5 5 2 BS 0 8 0 2 5 4 1 3 3
9. 3 8 23 0 21 27 172 4 1 9 cm 61 1 4 7 kg 12088 1 Normal Squat NS Forward Squat FS
10. 3 NS FS 5 5 Milt 2 BS 5 4 1 NS FS BS 3 X BS
11. REM 2 470 486 2007 5 BRR 53 321 336 2004 6 Gaston Ariel Nishiwaki Yukio Urabe Kosuke Tanaka EMG Analysis of Loweer Extremity Muscles in Three Different Exercises J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc 9 21 26 2006 7 Valdeci C D Gil LA Marcos D et al Kinematic Kinetic and EMG patterns during dowonward squatting Journal of Electromyoraphy and Kinesiology 18 134 143 2008 8 Felipe S J Maira R R Marcio M et al Optimization proposal for squatting exercise An EMG analysis J Phys Educ Sport Manag 2 4 37 43 2011 9 Yiu Ming Wong Rachel KS Christopher M P The VMO VL activation ratio while squatting with hip adduction is influenced by the choice of recording electrode Journal of Electromyoraphy and Kinesiology23 443 447 2013 10 B 2 1 27 37 2006 11 F Lacquaniti R Grasso M Zago Motor Patterns in Walking News Physiol Sci 14 168 174 1999 12 R Grasso L Bianchi F Lacquani
12. 5 0 994 R 0 999 NS 1 05 FS 1 08 BS 0 91 BS NS 0 39 FS 0 44 BS 0 27 BS 1 50 NS FS NS FS BS BS NS FS
13. NS 53 76 9 50 19 70 5 27 PP FS 54 49 8 73 7 22 15 5 85 BS 45 44 13 25 13 05 8 78 p lt 0 05 2 2 KARE KARE OO TR VC LS ER F 6 032 p lt 0 005 1 8 10 2 9 10 37 6 10 F 12 846 p lt 0 001 1 6 10 2 3 7 10 4 9 10 5 6 10 F 31 725 p lt 0 001 1 5 10 2 3 6 10 4 5 8 10 6 7 9 10
14. 60 14 5 16 8 22 7 15 29 24 1 32 5 15 3 24 1 32 59 3 3 E M amp 2AL AMOR bh l RBMA bh 7 23882 UL KREM SO D Ro RE 0X8
15. HOR 2010 22 Escamilla RF Fleisig GS Zheng N et al Effects of technique variations on knee biomechanics during the squat and leg press Med Sci Sports Exerc 33 1552 1566 2001 23 Hwang S Kim Y Kim Y Lower extremity joint kinetics and lumbar curvature during squat and stoop lifting BMC Musculoskel Disord 2 10 15 2009 24 MHC TF 2008 25 Brad J S Squatting Kinematics and Kinetics and their application to exercise performance J Strength Cond Res 24 12 3497 3506 2010 26 Toutoungi D E Lu T W Leardini et al Cruciate ligament forces in the human knee during rehabilitation exercises Clin Biomech 15 176 187 2000 Abutract Purpose This study s aim were to consider the relationship of the joint angle of lower extremity in the squat of the three conditions how the differences in the each squats affect the amount of muscle activity during the each squats and whether there are the constant ratio between the body segments in the each squats Methods The subjects were healthy adult 8 males average age 23 0 21 27 years old The motor task was squat motions of the three conditions that firstly was descending the center of gravity beneath A secondly was moving the center of gravity forward B thirdly was moving the center of gravity to the rear C At that time we measured the
16. Vicon MX VICON motion systems fL f VICON 100Hz VICON Plug in Gait 16 20mm 0 0 0 2 WEB 1000 KIRE Rectus femoris RF Vastus medialis VM Vastus lateralis VL AR BAR Bi
17. MVC Scheffe Scheffe 59 4558 1 3 50 O 50 5 3 NS y 1 05x 0 41 R 0 999
18. Backward Squat BS 3 1 1 3 NS FS BS NS 5 FS BS 3 2 1
19. H FREER C BREAN EZAS SIBIUA 1A 9 79
20. F 11 624 p lt 0 001 1 6 10 2 7 10 3 8 10 4 9 10 5 6 10 nonae fe F 3 833 p 0 005 tk FS NS NS BS um AAR 8885 CARER PERERA USA IMUR BEL Cl S EX T UIABU EH X2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 47 533 507 563 569 664 727 853 818 10 36 0 69 1 81 0 97 1 87 229 453 462 598 3 85 497 485 499 6 70 568 602 659 7 04 7 95 867 9 01 RF FS ix 1 37 4 52 2 09 2 30 75 312 5 24 5 34 5 11 n s 5 43 5 75 6 81 6 69 7 47 7 85 11 75 11 16 11 97 14 22 10 95 12 71 1426 1584 17 56 2040 2246 22 94 23 56 28 38 4 98 5 02 5 56 6 85 5 92 8 62 11 77 12 30 8 61 14 87 VM Fg 8 24 12 68 1541 16 06 16 70 1642 2141 19 78 1859 21 37 2 63 4 95 6 89 5 44 4 71 4 65 9 04 7 52 5 78 8 43 7 72 8 24 10 43 1069 10 93 15 22 1683 1828 19 55 21 14 6 08 7 37 7 37 9 93 14 39 13 28 15 85 2008 20 17 21 83 1 95 2 61 2 61 4 33 7 92 4 95 7 54 8 12 7 84 6 96 7 48 9 21 9 21 12 05 11 71 1488 114 92 17 70 1889 1844 1 20 4 35 4 35 6 22 3 93 5 80 6 43 6 81 5 25 4 25 3 i 48 89 MG FS 8 11 7 13 8 68 7 69 8 47 8 34
21. TA 45 0 MG LG BAC ICC BAH O MVC MG LG MVC 3 SPSS ver 12 0J ICC 1 1 5 2 0 683 0 942
22. me PPnnnnnnnnnnnpnnpnnnnnr UL Aewet DD on cian 2014 03 25 http hd hand e net 10748 6763 we meis or Li ssertati on http www tmu ac jp HHHHHHHHHHHL 1 26 1 8 12895603 E THE 28 3 8 23 0 21 27 3
23. 8 4 8 41 8 37 4 TA FS gt NS gt FS HM RF 1 8 10 ps0 3 3 F 25 053 p lt 0 001 F 19 904 p lt 0 001 NS FS BS NS 1 04 1 19 1 09 FS 1 05 1 09 1 07 BS 0 79 0 91 0 85 NS 0 37 0 43 0 40 FS 0 39 0 44 0 42 BS 0 20 0 26 0 23 RI NS FS BS 1 0 43 0 39 0 20 2 0 43 0 42 0 20 3 0 41 0 41 0 21 4 0 38 0 42 0 21 5 0 37 0 43
24. lower limb joint angle by three dimensional motion analysis device and the amount of muscle activity in the surface EMG Results the muscles on the front of the lower extremities rectus femoris vastus medialis vastus laialis tibial anterior were involved mainly in all the squats Tibial anterior in particular was working significantly in the order of C A B For the exercise ratio the value of the ratio of C was significantly lower than the A and B Conclusion The relationship bitween hip knee and ankle joints was always constant through the squats But there was the difference due to the motion conditions in the ratio Keywords squat three dimensional motion analysis device joint angle surface EMG amount of muscle activity 12
25. 0 23 6 0 37 0 43 0 23 7 0 39 0 43 0 25 8 0 39 0 43 0 26 9 0 40 0 43 0 26 10 0 39 0 44 0 26 0 40 0 42 0 23 0 02 0 02 0 03 0 37 0 39 0 20 0 43 0 44 0 26 NS FS gt BS NS FS BS p lt 0 05 4B 1 69 0 9 8 90 0 7 3 50 0 50
26. 60 37 19 32 096 JR 8RA523 27 29 30 Jr CHEE 36 0 90 42 9 46 59 51 39 21 996 AULA HDS 70 7 CH RE ffi 30 13 4 BERE AS 23 15 7 f5 60
27. ceps femoris BF fi Semitendinosus LAF ST BERSESVAMBIBH Medial gastrocnemius MG WERE RESMHIGA Lateral gastrocnemius LG Tibialis anterior TA OH 8 9 2 6Hz Root Mean Square RMS VICON 5 10 RMS maximum voluntary contraction LAF MVC RMS 1009 MVC MVC CYBEX NORM 5 10 3 RF VM VL OWE WAS TRA 90 BF ST OPES EEM THRA 45
28. p 0 001 FS y 1 08x 0 24 R 0 999 p lt 0 001 BS y 0 91x 1 10 R2 0 997 p lt 0 001 4 NS y 0 39x 0 05 R7 0 997 p 0 001 FS y 0 44x 0 24 R 0 999 p lt 0 001 BS y 0 27x 0 62 R2 0 993 p lt 0 001 50 BS NS FS GE cct pna LLL ener er tee erin ie ment ernee nate eert eres r wnr 3500 T Es y 1 08x 0 24 R 0 999 p 0 001 50 00 BS y 0 91x 1 10 R 0 997 p lt 0 001 4 NS y 1 05x 0 41 R 0 999 9 lt 0 0 001 em Bg 4000 N y 0 39x 0 05 R 20 997 p lt 0 001 co o FS 0 44x 024 8120999 pc0 001 m FS i 5 BS y 0 27x 0 62 R 0 993 p 0 001 W fs i a BS fs ee SS 85 NS 343 NS HE NS c B8 FS BE IFS 8S SRK 85 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4 50 3 4 1 50
29. ti Motor Patterns for Human Gait Backward Versus Forward Locomotion J Neurophysiol 80 1868 1885 1988 13 PARE ft MRI 29 4 113 118 2002 14 40 6 477 486 2006 15 MRI k 5E TO ii BIRN E 33 7 363 369 2006 16 James S Thomas Daniel M Corcos Ziaul Hasan Kinematic and Kinetic Constraints on Arm Trunk and Leg Segments in Target e Reaching Movements J Neurophysiol 93 352 364 2005 17 Codman E A The shoulder Thomas Todd Boston 32 64 1934 18 Inman V T Saunders J B M Abbott L C Observations of the function of the shoulder joint J Bone Joint Surg 26A 1 30 1944 19 MRI 11 6 14 1 13 23 2011 20 F Lacquaniti G Ferrigno APedotti et al Changes in Spatial Scale in Drawing and Handwriting Kinematic Contributions by Promaximal and Distal Joints J Neurophysiol 7 3 819 828 1987 21
Download Pdf Manuals
Related Search