ソニックブーム低減技術最前線
Contents
1.2.
3. 2012
4. 23 1 1 2 1 2 WECPNL75 2 3 H23 1 4
5. Summary of effects and threshold level for effects where sufficient evidence is available biological effect ORZ 4 indicator threshold 10
6. 1K N 2 SSBD N
7. 6 ICAO IATA ICCAIA CAEP WG 200
8. CO 2 20 1992 UNFCCC 1997 2005 IPCC 2007 4
9. NASA 14 GSonic Booms On Big Structures SonicBOBS Interior Effects Room IER 15
10. 12 NASA Perceived Level PL A ASEL A weighted Sound Exposure Level mM N BOO 2 8 og10 Geometric Mean Response ho 1 6 12 I 4 2
11. 1 1929 1 Wallace Waterfall X 0 108 Moise in MY subway Nowe in stenographic Meise riding in train i T oa average busy sires tuumaa in conversation Soft radio music in epevtment Average whisper 4 fLaway Rusts al loaves ic gontit brosse 1
12. CO 2012 2 60 873 787 2008 7 3 787 2 787 1 787
13. 1980 No 16 2012 1 Wallace Waterfall A loudness scale How the audiometer scale can be applied to problems of practical acoustics in buildings Engineering News Rec
14. 8 859 1 5 3 IINCE
15. 27 1000 0 25 4 kHz 1 6 5 5 5 10 15 20 Toneburst response dB 25 30 35 40 1000 500 200 100 50 20 10 5 2 1 65 0 25 Toneburst duration ms 27 4kHz
16. iod cc poe 3 5 anes 16 12 8 i cui pte ae ME 3
17. EMCRELK CORA C THBAFIG3AE Z 6 100
18. 3 3 uppe semang E CCS 1 leew pphm ARAT 3 4 GE 1 WEN RIEL 23 pphm
19. 3 1 L C Nol 1997 p30 2 No5 2001 p39 24 B 1
20. 2010 1995 15 2010 3 2 ICAO 10 ICAO CBDR EU EU European Union Emission Trading Scheme EU ETS
21. Bo 3 The treatment of noise contribution due to aircraft ground activities on airport noise model Wh LER ORs SL CRIT oH 2007 d L
22. 1980 25mm 1 13mm 1 2 HO DO BAB BIZ CesvatES8SC 1003 Hk Cirrus 2 22 16 1980 Cesva SC 10 Cirrus 2 22 X SC 10 A 2 22 A C
23. 03 04 ed 10 1960 LEA S S T 1 No 16 2012 11 10 1 Peekel Advance OR 12
24. A List 101g AE T e E 6 A 6 7 KET 1s PT 400x10 Pa s 5 10 1990 19 1990 B amp K 2250 2250 1 3
25. 3 2 1 Bd3 3 3 5 3 6 3 7 3 8 3 9 22 No 16 2012 BRE pphm
26. A Bo 787 49 No 16 2012 5
27. 3 Motility Las nsae 32dB Miedema 2003 of BE motility SHS EROA Sleep quality T14L Ama 42dB Medical conditions Environmental insomnia Laight ousiae 420B
28. No 16 2012 767 M 95 M 98 2001 9 11
29. WHO Disability Adjusted Life Year DALY quality of life QOL DALY DALY DALY YLL YLD YLL YLD HS YLL
30. ppm 3 1 QE 1 3 2
31. JIS JIS C 1503 1957 7 L Los ER JIS JIS Z 8731 1957 A B C 3 65dB A 60 85dB B 80dB C 1 B 2 60dB A 85dB C 1 Current situation and issues on noise metrics used for evaluation of environmental noise in Japan 2 3 4
32. 1930 Sound level meters 1928 to 2012 Marsh amp Nustad Enterprises Alan Marsh Alan Marsh IEC 1950 1961 IEC 80
33. 30 37 DC 8 707 880 B 747 5 43
34. 19 1990 B amp K 1 2260 BE 13mm 17 3 6 2000 6 1 IEC61672 1990 IEC651 1979 IEC804 1985 3 TEC61672 1 2002 IEC61672 1 2002
35. N NASA F A 18 i 2006 Low Boom No Boom annoyance 13
36. 3 5 GE 1 pphm EU 3 7 No 16 2012 pphm 3 9
37. 6 GR1551A 7 GR 1555 A 6 GR 1551 A 7 1950 GR1555A sound survey meter
38. 7p 1 7 0 mp 0 p et er 7 1 2 FE r 3 4 2 pM Es ag y 4 VM i Fy i Whitham oF WL MEIN SB
39. 5 5
40. No 16 2012 1 3 2007 2008 2007 1 9 4 7 2 7 17 20 INCE J ASj INCE AS IINCE CSC I INCE 2008 9 4 7 450 TB TI INCE CSC 2009 1 14 I INCE INCE AS INTER NOISE 2011
41. Z24 1936 2 17 1936 10 3 Z24 3 1936 2 3 CN SUM UU E EA Pi y MEO ge 224 3 1936 m American Tentative Standards for SOUND LEVEL METERS FOR MEASUREMENT OF NOISE AND OTHER SOUNDS AMBRIGAN ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRI Ad gh ANDAR DS EE 3 1929
42. 1 RE ON LETHE RS ot EE gaa see 06 22 ME YR Laeg T 22 06 Lass i ci uox xS 07 22 OET TER ERIE o Wi Te OC IR Bc Rot n ri 22 07 gap BOSTONE WECPNE Hes den 07 19 19 22 22 07 ah EI E WECPNL CALas gn uz EC SO Lok sks as bikie e 3 RE HJ
43. CBDR Common But Differentiated Responsibilities 2011 2012 2015 2020 2013 3 3 1 CO 2
44. WHO Quantifying burden of disease from environmental noise Second technical meeting report 2005 64 28 0 039 0 071 0 039 0 071 7 Global Burden of Disease
45. 11 2 26 12 1937 JE No 16 2012
46. 8618kg 8 618kg 3 JAXA 2020 2030 3 WG2 1 ICAO
47. International Civil Aviation Organization ICAO T oJ 2003 F 5 SSBD Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstrator 1 SuperSonic Business Jet SSBJ ICAO Committee on Aviation Environmental
48. aera mie DP ea No 16 2012 JIS A B C C 26
49. 5 1 1 1 2011 INTER NOISE I INCE 2006 Congress Selection Committee CSC INTER NOISE IINCE INCE AS IINCE William Lang Review of hosting INTER NOISE 2011 and Brief Summary of the Congress RY 2003 2008 2007 1 INCE AS 1 2
50. a 12 1960 Rion NA 07
51. E 3 37 E 3 1 Limit or reduce the impact of aviation GHG emissions on lobal climate Limit or reduce the number of people affected by significant Limit or reduce the impact of aviation emissions on local air aircraft noise quality Ss Quantify Mitigate implement 1 ICAO ICAO CAEP Trends of ICAO CAEP
52. 1 4 20094E 1 Lk Sound Environment as a Global Issue 2010 2009 2010 ICA 2010 2010 2011 3 960 3 11
53. 2 3 787 A one piece acoustic barrel 4 4 A Say HERIT MERER E k URDURI A
54. F S A C 2231 5 9 1 24 H
55. healthy worker effect SEET ATZ lRON
56. 5 1 167 2009 135 2010 110 INTER NOISE 2010 I INCE 135 2011 3 11 No 16 2012 2
57. CO 2050 2 5 CO ICAO gt 1 4 2 1 CO2 290 IEA CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2009 Edition 2007 A 2008 2012 1990 796 AA 696 8 6
58. YLD I x DW XL 1 DW DW 0 1 Environmental Burden of Disease Series No 1 WHO 0 81 Alzheimer 0 64 AIDS 0 50 0 01 I L DW DALY 4 No 16 2012 DALY DALE
59. 2016 10 CAEPF NASA Superboom Caustic Analysis and Measurement Program SCAMP 2011 2011 2 Waveforms and Sonic boom Perception and Response WSPR f No 16 2012 Community Response to Sonic Boom Notional Roadmap for Research to Support Standards Development 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 0 4 P SSTG CAEP SS
60. 25 Noise attenuation in Varying atmospheric conditions CL S Bier OD WE 26 Real Time Simulation of Far Field Rotorcraft Noise with Ground Effects using Efficient Hybrid Method and GIS GIS 27 To update or not to update noise limits that is the question amp 2t 2 YU IRR 73 28 Research on the Noise Environment and Human Appraisal of the Kadena and Futenma Air Bases on Okinawa iU 4 FM c 3E IBI TE SE EB o Bx rr st fi SS63 Aircraft Noise Modeling and Monitoring 29 Future environmental trends commercial aviation 30 Overview on the development of the airport noise modeling standard DIN 45689 DIN45689 31 Sensitivity of aircraft approach noise modeling to aircraft configuration and speed management
61. 1 WECPNL 7 r F 12 A S WANA 2 8 18 18 23 23 8 3 C WECPNL 70dB
62. 787 10 SEG 787 787 787 Game Changer 6 Cruise Flaps System 1 1 Trailing Edge Variable Camber 25 000 M 54 M 87
63. SC 10 2 22 5 7 2 1970 1980 MOK KAW 2 Sk p uT ps d 3 AFTER ATS a
64. 4 53 21 22 3
65. 0265 1 04 1 BOUE 4 LEA 10 1
66. 8 98 0 06ppm ppm 007 2 0 06 14 14 005 eg gy 0 04 IR ee oie May Zai Y y a d Sa 0 03 B 0 01 545 47 49 81 59 65 57 59 61 63 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 GE 1 2 2 4 5 NO Bd 2 5 8
67. OFFICIAL MES NOISE MI MK 2 1929 noise meter 25kg Bell 55dB warbled tones LULT RE
68. FAST SLOW A B C 6
69. EO REAM AAO RAO R CREDAL O AK 10 50 5 1 physical 3 WHO 2011 Burden of disease from environmental noise 2 POONA BET BL burden of disease WHO
70. 1932 5 1934 5 1936 2 17 Z24 3 1936 1936 3 2 Z24 3 1936 60 WI A B 2 A flat
71. 1 HERRE O 2 CVD HYENA 6 45 70 4861 10dB 24dB 3 Lau CADdBELE 60dB 4 CVD 5 6 7
72. A C Z F S 4kHz 10 LJ M e hting dB e Fle D gt Frequency weighti o a b e 10 20 40 80 160 315 630 1250 2500 5000 10000 20000 Frequency Hz 25 IEC61672 1 A C Z 25 A C Z 10 Hz 20 kHz 1 16 Hz 16 kHz 26 SO
73. 25 mm 66 No 16 2012 13 B amp K 2203 3kg 1960 25mm F S 2203 2 Hz 20kHz flat 0dB 5 3 1970 1965 IEC 1973 10Hz 80Hz 7 1970 IEC TC29 IEC123
74. 16 1980 2 16
75. 60 No 16 2012 30 1 35 Alexander Graham Bell bel 2 3 2 1928 1929
76. 8 2000 T5 T6 T9 No 16 2012 T5 3 2 FAA
77. j 1033 86 1 mas E 1 e 0 05 5 Boeing N 2 5 6 2 N 2 Gulfstream Quiet Spike NASA
78. Wellbeing EJ ICSD 2 3 40 No 16 2012 1 2 3 5 P 2 physiological 3 pharmacological 4 psychological 5 psychiatric
79. 2 2 1 3 3 1 2 1 2 8 1 21 3 CO NDIR APMA 3600 APHA 360 HO FID K1 GPH 104 H
80. 3 QO 23 2011 ISO 2011 4 40 2011 1 Alternative and supplemental noise metrics to A weighted average sound level used for environmental noise assessment in Japan No 16 2012 AR 2011 9 2 The influence of ground surface conditions on long range propagation of heavy weapon noise 2011 9 3 Improvement of the aircraft noise monitoring and information disclosure system at Narita Intarnational Airport in response to the revised guideline for aircraft noise
81. 30 1 INTER NOISE 2012 38 3 INTER NOISE 2011 Sound Environment as a Global Issue 20
82. IEC 1985 IEC804 1985 9 17 17 OO 1985 IEC804 1985 5 8 1980 1980 B amp K 2231 18 B amp K 2231 18 B amp K 1980 1 2231 13mm
83. 5 7 000 787 6 000 27cmx 39cm 7 ii 787 1 787 235VAC 270VDC 3 000 PSI 787 A380 5 000 PSI
84. 19 No 16 2012 ppm 7 UE 2 6 E 2 5 Ws chc 2 cU 10 Tw Macs m T 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 204g GE 1 2 2 1 2 NMHC 2 2 59 8 9 6 9 3 0 20ppmC 0 3lppmC
85. 2 3 5 11 4 RROD Et RH 5 6 7 8 9 T9 T9 L Finegold ZIBO Noise policy Noise Effect ICBEN A Bristow OE UB FUE C k o Bit eo economic valuation dB gt
86. SG uw CAEP 23 13 ICAO CAEP 3 1 CAEP 9 1 2012 2 CAEP WG CAEP 8 20094F 2 2 2 WG 1 1 CAEP 8 3 Chapter 4 10 12dB 2dB
87. WHO EU WHO 38 No 16 2012 1 ICAO CAEP 2007 Assessing Current Scientific Knowledge Final Report COVAR b CHAO ELD t7 computational cut off sufficient EWeS NER 0 EZ It 5
88. 1 No 16 2012 40 60Hz 5 6dB 6dB NJ L Vibration and oppressive feeling ru EL a KN E 5 NS NN Equal Loudness OM H ANTIS H ssl 10 20 30 50 100200 500 1000 Frequency in Hz SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL de 1 9 WECPNL 90 75dB LLT Lean 89 81dB WECPNL Lu
89. APU 4 Improvement of the aircraft noise monitoring and information disclosure system at Narita International Airport in response to the revised guideline for aircraft noise 1978 2007 WECPNL Lan 5 Review of environmental measures for noise issues around defense facilities in Japan HAI BISA Bj f amp amp Doe Ji 02 00 c
90. 22 3 53 21 AE Ze ARE WTA 2 did R 2 1 e CN ERU 2 3 6 km Long term air quality study of the environmental air around the Osaka International Airport M AP FI Ae kkk X WM X lisi LET BHO 6 km 317 m A 1 828m x45m EA B 3 000m x60m B 13 21 RN B
91. No 16 2012 SSO 7 Aircraft Noise Prediction and Control 7 Aircraft noise modelling and assessment in the IESTA program IESTA 8 Comparative consideration of airplane class data for aircraft noise analysis 9 Correlation of structural acoustic testing and finite element analysis of aircraft cabin noise control designs 10 Detection localization and tracking of aircraft using acoustic vector sensors 11 EASA study on background noise and noise from en route aircraft BANOERAC 12 Experimental and numerical study on a two wheel main landing gear noise 13 Jet Noise Reduction by Notched Nozzle
92. 9 2 T5 BAR T6 25 T1 T5 26 T2 T3 T7 27 T9 T8 T9 28 T6 899 25 T1 T5 T4 26 T2 T3 T7 27 T6 T8 T9 2 87 ICBEN 2011 South T1 27 T2 2 T3 11 T4 9 T5 4 T6 27 T8 4 T9 3 235 10 Tenth International Congress on Noise as a Public Fare h P Health Problem ICBEN 2011 B My
93. CO 1800 0 028 2000 0 037 100 0 7C 2035 CO 2 2 2030 60 2 5C 21 64C 5T 18 59cm very high confidence
94. 66 33 666 73 2 2 30 20 3D 7 BRB INTER NOISE
95. International Commission on Biological Effects of Noise on Man ICBEN 9 10 3 Heathrow 1 ICBEN 5 2008 3 ICBEN 3 T1 T9
96. 1960 NA 07 F S 13 1960 Brael amp Kj r B amp K 2203 30cm 3 kg gt H ML Ace We FLA 11 Peekel 1960 es c Otis STEC TOATE a C Advance SPM1 6 genta EMRE LEI DOR HAS mm 2203
97. A Arman 5 A cn A4
98. 2012 6 2012 10 ICAO 38 11 COP18 MBM 1 a AR Rt AR R AP AP AP P AP l Pa k PsQgs P Og
99. 7 S NASA defined an initial set of design parameters and performance levels for practical supersonic airliners in the near mid and far term time frames Systems Studies have been used to determine if these E 5 45 goals are valid and ETATE E achievable Technology Challenge Goals N 2 Small Supersonic Airliner N 3 Efficient Multi Mach Aircraft 4 NASAO HERA Ground Pressure Signature Undertrack M 1 8 CL 0 1 h 1 114 13 69 50 94 34 84 05 Hh 2 114 20 66 69 9361 8127 hi 3 114 74 66 34 93 93 8121 hi 5 114 96 6641 94 49 8170 0 00 0 05 0 10 0 15 0 20 0 25 3 f No 16 2012 Overpressure psf Shaped Loudness Equivalent to Bil star cruise 0 30 psf N wave Wil End cruise 9 psf N ws Start Cruise 271 000 Ib 45 500 ft End Cruise 191 000 Ib 52 800 ft Alpha 7 2 5 degrees Rise time z 1 msec psf 6 Lockheed Martin N 2 7 Gulfstream Quiet Spike 19 3 2 EU HISAC HIgh Speed AirCraft 2004 5 13 37 SSB HISAC
100. 19 Does the Economic Instrument be Necessary to Abate Aircraft Noise at Bangkok International Airport 20 European Research on Balanced Approach and Management of Noise Impact 21 Investigation of Noise Management and Noise Mitigation Measures at Selected International Airports in Europe and the US ICAO Balanced Approach Fk A amp KEA EL ER 2E AS TEIR St Ze B er FB OU Bk 36 No 16 2012 22 Sound synthesizer tool for on line sound quality analysis and target sound design of aircraft flyovers qui Too SS62 Managing Noise issues around Airport and Military Facilities 23 Comparison study of Annoyances from Military and Civilian aircraft noise 24 Environmental communication for noise management and partnership with the local community at Narita International Airport
101. 2020 1990 096 2596 20 2196 2 2 1 1 1 1 1990 2004 52 1997 International Civil Aviation Organization ICAO 1 6
102. 8 Sukhoi 2009 HISAC SSB Minimum environment Performance performance for eting viability Environment 8 HISAC 3 3 JAXA 2005 Silent SuperSonic S3 1 2009 Drop test for Simplified Evaluation of Non symmetrically Distributed sonic boom D SEND
103. Bell Telephone Johns Manvile 1928
104. 21 24 8 1 2012 21
105. 2001 2009 Recent situation on global environmental issues in international air transportation 10 No 16 2012 2010
106. US A 1 kHz 2 1 A 2 1 7 1
107. 2 2 40 953 IE 718 196 39 LINCE 12 2 10 A No 16 2012 447 47 83 56 46 42 30 29 26 20 1 38 674 2 6 666 566 100 968 Republic of Korea mem United States of ma France m United Kingdom of m Taiwan m Netherlands m Norway m Hong Kong Special m Denmark M Be
108. ICAO CAEP 1 2011 2 3 tyt ld e3x Hp B 16 24 3 27 24 3 30 1 2012 144 0041 1 6 5 5 03 3747 0175 FAX 03 3747 0738 THE JOURNAL OF AVIATION ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH No 16 2012 FOCUSES CONTENTS The forefront of the sonic boom reduction technology Recent situation on global environmental issues in international air transportation RESEARCH REPORTS Long term air qual
109. 3 Chapter4 3dB 5dB 7dB 9dB 11dB 5 2017 1 2020 1 2 MDG FESG 3 No 16 2012 2 hit 3 Chapter4 Chapter 3 2 2 dB HS 1 dB
110. 5 H23 2 6 DREAMS 7 H23 3 8 WECPNT 9 10 11 12 13 14 2 Annual activities of Aviation Environment Research Center 1 2 3
111. 0 108 CHS 10 96 Engineering News Record 1929 1 10 Wallace Waterfall 2 2 1928 1929 1920 1929 1920 1928 24 1
112. AEDT RO PEEL EL RUN OD TBLZS ILA 5 7 3 2 12 3 Hisashi Sano Franck Poisson Dominique Collin 3 Stephen A StansfeldO Bit E 4ER D Keith Wilson Neil J Mansfield 5 6 6 7 I INCE FCTP Future Congress Technical Planners INTER NOISE 2011
113. DALYs WHO wm Ra e S F Leo sy 165 dB A d 2 DPRBORBS C HMAS Burden of disease from environmental noise WHO Euro 2011 43 10 ICBEN2011 RY 1 Kensington Imperial College Albert 10 Hall 10th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem ICBEN 2011 100m Sir Alexander 2011 7 24 28 Fleming Building London Imperial College HA X 1ICBEN
114. 2009 2010 4 2008 2012 ICAO 2007 2010 37 ICAO market based measures MBM ICAO OTWA 2020 2050 2 liter RTK 1 26 2005 201
115. 2 1928 1929 at 2 1 1920 valve Bell Telephone No 16 2012 deafening effect ear balance ik
116. 2 QTD Quiet Technology Demonstrator Program 2001 11 777 200ER 2005 8 QTD2 General Electric Goodrich Corporation NASA ANA 777 300ER 48 No 16 2012 Rolls Royce Trent1000 3 ANA787
117. 4 3 General Radio 1947 General Radio 63 No 16 2012 5 1950 General Radio Company USA 1551A 5 1950 GR 1551 A GR 1551 A 2 4 ASM RO CTR MO Here at Cc 5 kg Shure 98 98
118. 3 2003 1925 20 Relation with an aircraft Wi Hp R 2 6 1931
119. EU EU ICAO Business Leisure 0 1 5 2 EU ETS EU GDP 10 EJ 0002 0026 GDP 2020 6 03 04 30 15 19
120. 47 53 59 76 79 WEE Fe Fee LE O1 CAU OR BAB C 5 1 1 0 f L 43 8 EPU AA 47 4 PEt
121. 80 7 3 2 1980 5 79 CH 80 sc en eR I E A
122. 3 1 6 7 37 1 Alternative and supplemental noise metrics to A weighted average sound level used for environmental noise assessment in Japan A A C 34 No 16 2012 2 Study on noise abatement effect of CDA procedures available for airports in Japan
123. C en TISO1996 2 1987 Amd 1 1998 4 1 2 1 12dB 2 3km 100Hz D
124. sg L WE k lre Mn 14e Jo R k l Peg P 1 2011 2 EC Directive 2008 101 EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 3 ICAO 57 2009 pp 309 312 mu 16 No 16 2012 f amp 4 1 58 2010 pp 241 246 5 ICAO GIACC WORKING PAPER GIACC 2 WP presented by JAPAN SOME BASIC COMPONENTS FOR THE REDUCTION MECHNISM OF CO2 EMISSIONS FROM INTERNATIONAL AVIATION 2008 6 EC Commission staff working document accompanying document to the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003 87 EEC so as to include aviation activities in the scheme for green house gas emission allowance trading within the Community 2006 7 Scheelhaase J M Schaefer W Grimme and S Maertens EU legislation tackling avi
125. 14 Study of jet noise source modeling and shielding effect for future aircraft SS60 Environmental Management towards Airport Sustainability 15 ANALYSIS OF A NOISE TRADING SCHEME FOR AIRPORTS THE MIME PRO ECT JT MIME 16 Noise Panel Report ICAO CAEP Workshop Assessing current scientific knowledge uncertainties and gaps in quantifying climate change noise and air quality aviation impacts BREF 7S AVR ICAO CAEP SS61 Balanced Approach of Airport Noise 17 An operational approach for airport capacity expansion at Narita International Airport 18 DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF AN ELECTRODYNAMIC LOUDSPEAKER USED IN A VARIABLE ACOUSTIC LINING CONCEPT
126. 4 Required Navigation Performance Authorization Required Approach FMS RNAV Waypoint FMS RF 2 787 CO CO 787 767 20 2008 Industry Limits 28 ANA Trent 1000 787
127. No 16 2012 5 5 t1 t2 A E pi t ae 5 Pass
128. 6 000 5 lt 8 000 3 6 000 5 8 000 ci 6 000 8 787 10 767 1 2
129. TWH 15 CO i n E Bl 6 787 1982 767 4 1995 No 16 2012 777 12 2008 A380 20 787 50 CO CO
130. 20 3 10 R R o A H 10 Ho 20 0 02 0 0 02 0 04 0 06 9 D SEND 1 10 D SEND 2 4 4 1 11 JAXA
131. Operational Opportunities ICAO 303 ATM CO 2 Bo
132. ca WECPNL 25 7 A4 A ICAO PNL D ROPRET L TARE O SEN No 16 2012 FIUNN Lan VAVREK L mao x 4 e A HA BROCCTRBUEISJUCS MS SIRE pneu ee ee SLOW F FAST D RAOR HT Cat 4 SHEE csi
133. 3 N wave 2 2 No 16 2012 f amp BLUNT NOSE SHARP NOSE NEAR FIELD MID FIELD GR OUND LOW BOOM HIGH BOOM HIGH DRAG LOW DRAG Figure 4 The low boom high drag paradox 3 9 3 3 1 SSBD NASA NASA FAP Fundamental Aeronautics Program N 1 SSB 2010 N 2 2020 N 3 2030 4 N 2 Boeinmg Lockheed Martin
134. 2001 QTD GE 2 ANA QTD 2 2005 777 300ER 787 85 767 2 2 2 787 787 787 Trent 1000 Trent 1000 Trent 5 10 1 3 Swept
135. 29 IEC TC29 Electroacoustics O 4 19 17 23 HD IEC IEC1906 43 1 ISO TC43 Acoustics SC 1 Noise 37 Alan Marsh Fellow CHV WEK Fellow INCE USA
136. A UN whttp www kobayasi riken or jp news No 77 JUL 2002 3 JIS C 1503 1957 1957 4 S Morita Statistical analysis on sound level and loudness JASJ 17 1 3843 1961 5 JIS Z8731 Methods for Measurement of sound level 1957 revised in 1966 6 JIS Z8731 Acoustics Description and measurement of environmental noise 1999 7 I Yamada and J Igarashi Criteria for aircraft noise in Japan Inter Noise 96 1996 8 I Yamada and J Igarashi A Procedure to evaluate artillery sound for environmental countermeasures in Japan Inter Noise 99 1999 9 Y Tokita and S Nakamura Frequency weighting characteristics for evaluation of low frequency sound Inter Noise 81 1981 10 P D Schomer L R Wagner L J Benson and E Buchta Human and community response to military sounds Results from field laboratory tests of small arms tracked vehicles and blast sounds Noise Control Eng J 42 2 71 84 MAR APR 1994 11 Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety EPA ONAC 550 9 74 004 MAR 1974 12 H18 11 2 30 ICAO CAEP 1 ICAO 2011 2013 3
137. 32 RNAV Departure Procedures Produce Unexpected Results At John Wayne Airport Implications For Noise Modeling RNAV A 33 Aircraft noise Generation A neural network model 34 Sound source identification technique for monitoring noise due to aircraft ground activities Piob E Stir Wd S 35 Improved monitoring system of airport noise including ground noise at Narita Airport 36 The new standards ISO20906 and DIN45643 what does it mean in praxis for praxis for airport noise monitoring system 37 IBANET A new concept of airport noise monitoring IBANET 2011 WHO Joint Research Center bebe Ok ARIAT ON Burden of disease from environmental n
138. No 16 2012 f amp a s a ote tees Rice Pal az ug YU d Indoor Outdoor 195 80 85 90 95 100 105 CSEL dB 13 NASA Low Boom No Boom 7 Indoor Exposure Probability 80 0 2 Notional 2 75 70 0 15 _ 2 gt 3 65 8 o 8 60 01 gt dis Different buildings 5 gt 55 respond differently 8 a 2 t a 9 50 0 05 45 40 L0 50 60 70 80 Outdoor Criterion 14 9 Test facility overview Exterior loudspeakers playback sonic boom Transmits through walls to interior Interior loudspeakers Typical home construction wood and drywall 12 ftx 14 ft x 8 ft Living room furnishings Window removable 15 NASA IER 9 4 3 ICAO SSTG 2010 8 CAEP 16
139. annoyance Evidence WHO Europe Night Noise Guidelines z E L RERE E annoyance Cardiovascular hormonal measures T6 3 T6 8 1
140. 1 0 95 v TUO E 1 0 1 0 18 1 6 14 96 Cl a 12 g Pooled A 95 CI os 0 6 5 e e e d Lies sy i6 dB A Source of the data Babisch et al 1993 126 1 CHW
141. http www aercjp JE 3 11 1
142. 2012 2 WG3 CO2TG CAEP Interaction 2 PM Tx SAE KEE ASHE OW AL Ro TWH CAEP 9 PM SAE a Su WG3 CO2 CAEP 10 PM 3 3 NOx
143. WHO environmental noise Practical Guidance 2010 v fife HS Bet SE DW 0 09 b 55 BE 2E DW 0 23 Z 35 42 0 02 001 0 12 2 Burden of disease from DALYs 61 000 45 000 903 000 E HID 22000 587 000 10 16 BA 1
144. F S F 2 S 5 A 0 ud 0 1 10 2 2 10 lg 1 20uPa 20 2 10 68 No 16 2012 5 6 1980
145. 2011 5 ICN Intenational Conference nurses 2011 5 ICAO CAEP MDG L470 78 Y 2 2011 6 2011 7 ICBEN 10 2011 7 1 19 2011 7 2011 9 2011 9 23 2011 8 2011 9 40
146. 3 1929 12 6l No 16 2012 3 1930 3 1 Z24 3 1936 1930 V O Knudsen Z224 1932 5 4 ANSI 1932 1933 1934 5 Z24
147. C 1000 Hz 10 W cm 0 0002 dynes cm 62 No 16 2012 1936 SI 20 20 Pa 1 Pa 1 N m 01 dynes cm 19936 A 1929 Z24 2 1936 3 A 40dB B A
148. ei a a 26 2 Level of output signal dB 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Level of input signal dB 26 1 2 90 100 110 120 130 140 3 GB IEC61672 1 1kHz 60dB No 16 2012 3
149. 1 2011 9 28 9 787 ANA 34R 3 9 25 787 ANA 787 7 2004 4 26 ANA 787 50 7 5 1 2011 9 28 34R 787 7 787 2 The Boeing 787 s technology for lower noise and fuel efficiency A E HU
150. NTA VJT Zl WE ORHI E IL BREF OD FRAY Lee ESI 55 0 C A IINCE TSG 9 A 7 A loudness 2 4 loudness nnoisiness annoyance C 4A C loudness noisiness
151. ppmC 1 2 2 1 3 che 3 7 ame 0 53 55 57 59 61 63 2 4 6 8 GE 1 BHO 2 2 2 6 9 3 3 THC Bd 2 3 10 12 14 16 18 20 ppmC 4 UE 2 Be 3 3 Tho 3 7 rick 0 53 55 57 59 61 63 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 GE 1 2 2 3 4 NO Ed 2 4
152. 1 787vs767 300ER 787 767 300ER Zoe lE E 5 m T No 16 2012 787 OUCH 2 3 38 lL COMB iit 7 IV Cruise Faps System 6 CO 3 2011 10 26 787
153. 2011 5 1 D SEND 1 D SEND 1 5 6m 8m 20km 1km 9 10 D SEND 2 40 30 L
154. 133 RTK CO 2005 2020 Business Leisure 1 10 4 46 183 Scheellhaase et al 2009 40 CO 1 25 40 2012 18 19 4 58 CO
155. 270 55 47 36 35 32 2 5 SS07 Aircraft Noise Prediction and Control 8 Inter Noise 2011 Sound Environment as a Global Issue AEE Hi HA BB SS60 Environmental Management towards Airport Sustainability 2 SS61 Balanced Approach of Airport Noise 7 SS62 Managing Noise issues around Airport and Military Facilities 12 SS63 Aircraft Noise Modeling and Monitoring 7 3
156. 1 1 2 No 16 2012 2 3 20 IEC61672 1 2002 2012 IEC61672 3 NORME CEI 8 INTERNATIONALE IEC 5 INTERNATIONAL 61672 1 STANDARD Pramas isin wm om z 3 A N E E Elettroacoustique 2 3 Son m tres H 8 Partie 1 Sp cifications 2 d e Sound esi mdr a 2 Part 1 2 2 Specifications 2 H 5 5 5 E 2 m 2 a 2 i Ap gt o 20 1 2 2002 5 IEC61672 1 6 2 IEC 61672 1
157. 2 2 A PAO ur pe az OW X 0 gt co t p m 2 X 1 2 125 ms 1000 ms 125 ms FAST 1000 ms SLOW
158. 0 25ms 4kHz 1 4 3 bg Lrg 7 T 4 kHz 1 0 25 7 1000 27 101g 0 25 1000 360 7 1930 3kg 0 5kg 1 kg
159. HER 30 2 6 The influence of ground surface conditions on long range propagation of heavy weapon noise
160. ICAO 2012 2020 2008 2012 2050 2 i 8 ox H Lir dons 5 19904E JE ICAO 190 187 BE E gt E E B mo Bi ICAOBIEGSAURETGRT SID LORE oe tee eli etie Ke 40 E E TRED ICAO RTK 1 MBM ee dci rR
161. M ys aie AK A Marion Burgess Australia Jean Pierre Clairbois Belgium Samir Gerges Brazil Gilles Daigle Canada Trevor Nightingale Canada Jing Tian China Ondrej Jiricek Czech Republic Douglas Manvell Denmark Jean Tourret No 16 2012 France Hugo Fastl Germany Joachim L pez Spain Tor Kihlman Sweden Scheuren Germany Maurice Yeung Hong Ulf Sandberg Sweden H Temel Belek Kong Luigi Maffei Italy Sonoko Kuwano Turkey Bernard Berry UK Philip A Japan Yoiti Suzuki Japan Yang Hann Nelson UK Robert J Bernhard USA Kim Korea Truls Gjestland Norway Patricia Davies USA William W Lang Jorge Patricio Portugal Ant nio P rez USA Rajendra Singh USA Sound Environment as a Global Issue Opening Ceremony Closing Reception Registration Desk INTER NOISE 2012 1928 2012 1
162. Voluntary Work Force JAXA WG 33 2011 1 40 2011 I INCE 9 4 7 4 40 953 77 566 100 2 6
163. 64 No 16 2012 4 4 Rion 1950 N1101 8 1942 8 1950 N1101 1942 A 4 5 IEC 29 IEC TC29 IEC 1905 IEC 29 IEC TC29 TC29 1953 1
164. Operational Environmental Goal 4 WG3 1 2010 37 ICAO A37 19 1 CO 2013 CO CO CO 37 2013 32 No 16 2012 CO
165. gt N Sizov annoyance evidence ICBEN 2008 o 4 ICBEN 1 http www icben org 2 http www icben org Congresses html 3 ICBEN 9 http www aerc jp index php ID 50 amp cID 6 2009 46 787
166. w ML 98410 LSMCC GXH 103 MODEL1150 Os GFS 146 REA EAR GFS 146 n A 1158 GE 0 84 70 1 CO Bd 2 1 53 1 10ppm 8 20ppm 1 2 10ppm
167. 1 Larson Davis 831 Provo Quest Technologies 3M SoundPro Oconomowoc 22 1 Cirrus Research 171B Optimus Svantek tt Svan979 23 1 Cesva SC310 Rion NL 62 No 16 2012 24 1 Norsonic Nor140 B amp K 2270 Naerum 6 3 IEC 61672 1 ee IEC 61672 1
168. Armour Research Foundation 4 1947 4 1 Bn ui 4 1947
169. 2011 9 2011 7 4 1 2011 9 2 36 2011 1 1 33 3 No16 2012 3 5 23 80 No 16 2012 6 23 2011 2011 4
170. 4 6 5 1 4 25 lt
171. Asm 8 os Shik HEO Sa Js ee OE iE E HUE BT A T E MNRE L Hiep educa dia i edet Le BE ee ee E 3 3 1 WECPNL
172. CG 7 0 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 Game Changer 1 Boeing HP http active boeing com commercial orders index cfm 2 Boeing Commercial airplanes Communications Backgrounder BoeingQuiet Noise Technology Initiatives April 2007 3 Boeing HP http www newairplane com 787 design_ highlights EnvironmentalPerformance QuieterForTheCommunity Quieter AtNarita 4 Chrlotte Adams Green Engines Aviation Today May 1 2008 5 WMA No 14 2010 P11 6 David Reed William Herkes Belur Shivashankara A Boeing Program for Aircraft Noise Reduction
173. Lang INTO 2007 3 Lang INTER NOISE JNTO 2007 5H f amp 4 4 W
174. CL ama 33dHBA coronary heart disease CHD limited 60 65dBA Lea FYH gy E Lua RAW TEAR cost effectiveness analyses cost benefit analyses DALY QALY quality adjusted life year WHO COVUAR bAaHC RE O 3 local global 2 WH
175. ITNTER NOISE 2012 7 2 Yang Hann Kim I INCE 2012 S A Hamblic
176. VoL31 No 2 2007 4 7 20 3 8 Boeing HPF http www newairplane com environment FuelEf ficiency AndNoise 787Dreamliner 9 Rolls Royce Trent and the environment 10 James M Muhm MD MPH The Boeing Company Effects of Aircraft Cabin Altitude on Passenger Comfort and Discomfort Clinical Trial gov 11 No 2010 3 2011 3 8 INTER NOISE 2011 INTER NOISE T INCE 3 2011 INTER NOISE 2011 INCE t AST 2011 9 4 7 1975 1994 3 INTER NOISE 2011
177. A A 1974 Level Document B URBORICHEAT A DPB DRAET STL DAS 29 No 16 2012 D N 39 2 http www kobayasi riken or jp news No 39 JAN 1993 2
178. flat 1936 A B 4 1940 1950 4 1 Z24 3 1944 1940 ZZ24 3 1936 Z24 3 1944 A B C 4 2 1947 1930 1941 1946
179. IEC 5 1960 1990 5 1 IEC 123 Publication 123 IEC TC29 He IEC Publication 123 1961 pa 9 IEC Publication 123 1961 INTENN Recommandations relatives aux sonom ires Recommendations tor sound levet meters 9 1961 EC123 1961 5 2 1960 10 LBEA Laboratoire Electro Acoustique
180. 2 1 9 4 7 4 4 IEA IINCE G Daigle Wiliam W Lang Tor Kihlman 40
181. IEC179 3 IEC 651 1979 14 IEC651 1979 TIEC651 1979 14 OO 1979 IEC651 1979 5 4 1970 1970 Fe LRU EMET SE OO GE o 15 1970 2 SRE 2 Cirrus 2 21 Rion NA 09 15 1970
182. NOx LTO NOx NOx NOx tuli su P 5 MDG FESG amp MDG FESG 1 ICAO ICAO IFSET MDG ICAO 2
183. 3 dB ART OSA A EPRI AER LT 25kg 2 4 1928 12 27 40 Bell Telephone 1929 Acoustical Society of America ASA 1929 5 10 11 450 3 1 2 3 JASA 1 1 1929 10
184. 44 No 16 2012 24 25 ICBEN S Stansfeld London Imperial College FAA EU Evidence Cost Benefit economic valuation TOR KHOR Daniel Instone EU lt Noise Map 25 ICBEN 2014 26
185. 2010 DD 578 14 1 EBoDE project 1 9 6 DALYs Health and Environment in Europe Progress Assessment WHO 201
186. 67 03 40 10 12 14 16 18 20 Ott ttt 53 55 57 59 61 63 2 4 6 8 GE 1 2 2 6 7 SPM 2 7 8 1 2 0 1mg m 1 1 0 1mg m 1 0 2mg m
187. ANSS pp 79 82 2008 13 D SEND 41 pp 652 655 JSASS 2010 1115 2010 14 2 AXA 7 A Hil 42 2011 15 Yusuke Naka Subjective Evaluation of Loudness of Sonic Booms Indoors and Outdoors 2012 2012 16 S S Stevens Perceived Level of Noise by Mark VII and Decibels E Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51 pp 575 601 1972 17 B M Sullivan et al Human Response to Low Intensity Sonic Booms Heard Indoors and Outdoors NASA TM 2010 216685 2010 18 J Klos Measurement of Low Amplitude Sonic Booms In and Around Large Buildings NASA FAP Technical Conference 2011 19 J Rathsam et al Laboratory Study of Indoor Human Response to Sonic Booms NASA FAP Technical Conference 2011 20 Report of Supersonic Transprt Task Group of Working Group 1 ICAO CAEP 8 WP 35 2010 1
188. 2011 9 4 Review of environmental measures for noise issues around defense facilities in Japan 2011 9 5 Study on noise adatement effect of CDA procedures available for airports in Japan ATEC CAB 2011 9 6 The treatment of noise contribution due to aircraft ground activities on an airport noise model Bp 2011 9 2011 1 RR 2011 9 2 2011 9 O 2011
189. 787 777 737NG RNAV GBAS Ground Based Augmentation System 3 CDO Continuous Descent Operation Tailored Approach FMS GBAS GBAS 787 RNAV RNP AR 4 3 GPS Global Positioning System GBAS ILS
190. mg m 0 1 A 2 E BER GRIEF ORRE ch 13 6 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 l 2 2 7 8 SO X 2 8 53 1 1 0 04ppm 1 0 1ppm 1 2 0 04ppm ppm 0 07 2 n ae 13 005 10 0 04 0 03 0 02 0 01 0
191. 20 No 16 2012 e 2 2 24 15 y ve ap in he vr M eo b 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 QE 1 2 2 5 6 Ox 2 6 1 0 06ppm 04 2 E
192. 1 787 CO 787 1990 777 90 767 747 400 747 400 ibl SROV Service Ready Operational Validation ANA 787
193. 2 Cirrus 2 21 E Rion NA 09 F S Cirrus 2 21 No 16 2012 Rion NA 09 Ho E Cirrustt 8 2214 AB A0 ESNZ SE
194. 2011 2011 9 2011 FA 2011 9 2011 9 FKH 2011 10 2011 10 2011 11 36 JU 2011 11 2012 2 2012 3 2012 2012 3 No16 2012 3 No 16 2012 2 3 23
195. AER OO HO E pee Oo M tr LO EE OI E 28 No 16 2012 Y 4
196. WECPNL 75 X WECPNL L agent 13 Laden 62 62 X HE BE D La5L4410 91 62 Lo4 81 WECPNL 90dHB Lop L apt 19 Schomer Lo 1dB OW MABE O Lap O 2 dB OW 2Lop Lap WECPNL 90 Leaen 81 90 75 2 89 3 3 1950 ee T C 1955
197. 27 T9 L Finegold I amp OICBEN Zz 330 AMG FRC BE RC o 28 T6 T Gjestland T9 28 Matias Basiner S Stansfeld TOR FR ICBEN 2014 ICBEN 9 4 7 INTER NOISE 2011
198. 7 37 2011 28 6 7 15 120 JTB TJTB dH S
199. AER niii 1 ICAO Assembly Resolutions A35 5 2004 2 K Meredith et al Origins and Overview of the Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstration Program AIA A 2005 0005 2005 3 DH KW p 70 1969 4 p 99 2000 5 V Sparrow F Coulouvrat and Y Makino Status of Sonic Boom Knowledge ICAO CAEP 8 IP 26 2010 6 C M Darden Sonic boom Minimization with Nose bluntness Relaxation NASA TP 1348 1979 7 P Coen Supersonics Project Overview NASA FAP Technical Conference 2011 8 T Magee and E Adamson Boeing N 2 Low Boom Experimental Validation Phase I Project NASA FAP Technical Conference 2011 9 N Norstrud NASA N 2 Supersonic Validations No 16 2012 Program Overview and Technical Status NASA FAP Technical Conference 2011 10 D C Howe et al Quiet Spike Near Field Test Pressure Measurement with CFD Comparisons AIAA 2008 128 2008 11 P Martin Publishable Activity Report HISAC T 6 26 1 2008 12 TP ES T 40
200. gt ls c v9 mlloll s sS Slo SIR Slels 3 2 amp e s l wl e a elx e e l amp lo fe 5 2 28 3 xX 2 lOe i x 2 E lt om w x x X LL v 3 2 2 lo I x E X T e 3 30 14 No 16 2012 2013 2020 3 82 2012 85 2010 EU EU CBDR
201. 10 000 kilo liter 0 gt D QG S o e Z s o 9 s elf ce Fo c Qa cC o 5 c c9 es Os S clalg sis 5 ST 4 sp E x gt a S 35 8B Q al m S o u Sl S E aj 2 c a G wl x oO lt X X 2 o X x olo 5 X lt x PrP OO x 2 a r o X ojl l Z 5 4 c aie lt 5 al Ey gt ac rz 2 lt S o S c gt Ble 6 ly Sa Slo so Se TS amp S oe o P xu o gt S os 5 ioj S w c S k ols Sie cial wi N X Sx tic T 7 i e o 5 5 5 X o zl c E 3 n 299 287 285 284 263 246 232 193 186 144 140 137 132 122 122 117 115 113 107 103 96 2 30 0 8 0 7 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 2 fuel efficiency liter RTK 0 1 0 0 Japan Malaysia Thailand Canada France Singapore X China X Germany Netherlands X Australia United Kingdom Hong Kong Sar X United States Republic Of Korea United Arab Emirates
202. Protection CAEP SuperSonic Task Group SSTG 91 BIBI Bec 197 2 The forefront of the sonic boom reduction technology uu FIRST MEASUREMENT OF SHAPED SONIC BOOM Overpressure psf i i L 1 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Time milliseconds 1 SSBD 2 2
203. YY 5 One OMERO OMERIN A 1 E am 2003
204. a RTK 1 EU CO 4 ICAO ICAO CBDR 2007 i
205. and recommendation 1 05 113 SYEK E La 51 70dB A yanKempen 2 WHO Occupational Noise Environmental Burden of Disease Series No 9 vanKenmen Outcome 39 No 16 2012 BREN 00 RC UD LAE RREO e ANT NX DESEE OWE Sd d ACC do 0 ABER IC k D EENAA
206. pv 9 x H23715 4715 82 No 16 2012 23 D meom 10 n2395 ESSI mpg OTS 5 m Pei H2395 Emm cnr cma 2395 n225 E23 AE WE AE HEI v 7 m 12 H23107 122107 H231128 m i 81128 R028 23 Le PR Ee E 14 CNT RRE Be H231215 H231215 DEAR KA H24323 83 23 3 11 1 2 2
207. 0 RSE ORIG At WHO 2011 42 No 16 2012 1 AW Environmental Buren of disease Series No l WHO 2003 1 2 1 51 55dB 2 60dB 1 0
208. 0 2012 13 2013 2020 26 2021 2050 60 CBDR CO 2020 EU 12 No 16 2012 1 ICAO
209. 12 15 H225 10 D m Jar RED ZMZRDEd EE WR Ty 1 H22510 por weet 2 NH H22 7 15 H22 7 14 23 714 H21 11 13 BHO D 3 AR H24 6 14 eC A CARD BRE H22813 E Taja ja 4 yee H22813 oe ag Gh HABE HLA ABA H22827 2 H24 5 31 H22 8 27 5 H22827 12353 W m H22 8 27 H24 5 31 2 6 123323 2941 ig ogg dis 1125331 um A ze M Ie Re bte IE LIE LD H23531 ENT HF 3 EUES 17 7 H23531 H23630 PE es 8 23 HH2367 oo RAISER i H23716
210. 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 GE 1 2 2 8 2 No 16 2012 3 2 3 1 3 9 1 3 1
211. O 2009 Night Noise Guidelines for Europe Night noise for Europe 2007 ICAO 2008 we ICBEN International Commission on Biological Effects of Noise Y SEDRE Lau Lua 1 Guidelines
212. TG CAEP SSTG CAEP 8 9 10 Approved methodology test Begin draft of aee Metric Update Endorsed Standards Draft Bodm protocols and draft standards Methodology and Surrogate a c Methodology Community based on Standard and cert criteria derived from Protocol Document based test and Protocol Response FitTest Draft r rch an velopmen tocol Document Methodsand Certificatipn esearch and development protocols i Metric Development amp aaa a Validation Initiallndoor Initial Metric Revised Revised Metric for Simulator studies amp Outdoor Assessment Metrics Metric Draft Structural test and analysis Metrics Assessment Standards Whole house simulation Effects of the Atmosphere amp i le kaso e Initial Turb Secondary Secondary amp Focusboom Revised Integrated Modelsfor P y Model boom prediction cutoff boom prediction amp Turbulence atmospheric DraftCert Seasonal geographical amp Initial Climatic noise placement Model effectmodel Criteria climatic Effects assessment guidance Focus boom Secondary booms amp cut off Research Aircraft Development Develop requirements Design fab amp test aircraft Validate signature a Preliminary design amp risk reduction Fab go First Flight ahead Roll out Signature Validation Community Exposure Tests Public awareness process Surrogate a c Tests Test planning Test condu
213. The Journal of Aviation Environment Research aie CR RA ois anavav are aia QE tu ida DE sae ad ICAO CAEP oo 2011 WHO Euro No 16 2012 10 ICBEN2011 1 10 787 a I A tt INTER NOISE 2011 PC REAPER TITO ATE D ema 18 1928 2012 Alan Marsh 25 es 31 34 23 38
214. UTS M1 A B B T W 18 No 16 2012 A 2 TA 132 B 200 m 3 m 350 m 30 mic B 213 4 B 250 m 3 m 300 m 200 m Bf Jjb Bm
215. ation s CO emissions Model based empirical estimation of the economic and ecologic impact of the EU Emissions trading scheme on the international aviation sector A TRS Conference 2009 8 Gillen W W Morrison and C Stewart Air Travel Demand Elasticities Concepts Issues and Measurement Government of Canada Department of Finance Canada 2008 9 2 60 2012 forthcoming uA mp we ee ee 48 7 52 10 6 9
216. ction Community exposure test on Edwards AFB Community Initial test exposure protocols test of range Validatedtest Community protocols amp best Selection practices Test planning complete Test phase 1 complete Statistical Extrapolation to General Population Exposure L A LA AL AAA Correlation amp ai e Initial route amp exposure Revised route amp Single event Community Single event levels assessment exposureassessment level Response Assossmontol Number of exposures Model Model for Draft Response model Standards z eum y 20 M16 5 ICAO HER AE BRS
217. d e 100 19 3 93 97 20 3 4
218. i eile fuel liter RTK 3 AHRHICAOKEMLE SO C529 13 f No 16 2012 5 5 1 EU ETS EU ETS amp EU 2005 2012 2000 EU 2004 2006 CO 2012 97 2013 2020 95 15 a o eo e o eo a o o fuel consumption
219. iW 2J Lee BBE BUE oy 10 15 22 2207 WECPNL gt Laen T i a 2 ee 06 22 j Las ZEB Z 22 06 Hil La LA Fmax Las L E L5 LA Fmax 5 ER DET z Laeqr La Fmax XM ii CEERI ES WECPNLyetense x ADR 9 Chaa ippa d Lt Low 07 19 19 22 22 07 Leaen Defense Ler RO RUN E DRENERE RUE US 9 HE aus NAR ee Hi yt 07 19 19 22 22 07 12dB 26 No 16 2012 7 JIS Z 8731 1983 r C 7 2
220. ity study of the environmental air around the Osaka International Airport Current situation and issues on noise metrics used for evaluation of environmental noise in Japan DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN REPORTS Trends of ICAO CAEP Inter Noise 201 1 Sound Environment as a Global Issue Environmental Noise and Disability Adjusted Life Years DALYs A viewpoint of WHO Euro Tenth International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem ICBEN 2011 CURRENT TOPICS The Boeing 787 s technology for lower noise and fuel efficiency Review of hosting INTER NOISE 2011 and Brief Summary of the Congress Sound level meters 1928 to 2012 ESSAY Relation with an aircraft ACTIVITIES OF AERC Annual activities of Aviation Environment Research Center Yoshikazu Makino Yusuke Naka Katsuya Hihara Hiroki Hashimoto Minoru Mizushima Koji Suzuki Ichiro Yamada Makoto Morinaga Jiro Kaku Yuji Yanagisawa Hisashi Yoshioka Ichiro Yamada Tetsuya Kaneko Kyoichi Goto Ichiro Yamada Masao Hisano Ichiro Yamada Alan Marsh Yasuo Tokita Management Division 10 25 31 34 38 44 47 53 59 76 79 Airport Environment Improvement Foundation Aviation Environment Research Center K5 Building 6 5 Hanedakuko 1 chome Ota ku Tokyo 144 0041 Japan
221. lgium Australia China mm Germany Sweden 3 Poland 1 Singapore Switzerland Brazil Italy Turkey 2 300 250 200 pa 150 100 50 0 nnns ener 2 C G OG 2x OHY DELCCLB_YHK VDOHOHG Mss SSI EGFP EET SE EE DEE GS EG EG G 2 5 E G G EY DEO Cr 559 tc Jr OE ree eee PES EE ZESEE Em 22E gt o 9 a 70 CHA 80 10 270 55 47 36 32 28 21 2 40 1 35 No 16 2012 19 no show 21 6 INTER NOISE
222. mp BEA OO PETS OO FEO IR tT t T 1 69 No 16 2012 A T A AUVLi Laar L 10 4 0 4 3 20 uw Pa 3
223. nd Disability Adjusted Life Years DALYs A viewpoint of WHO Euro B T 3 duo fe WHO Euro JS RK Coronary Heart disease Cardiovascular diseases MERE ICAO 1 EU 2005 EU ETS 1990
224. oise Quantification on healthy life year life lost in Europe 1 disability adjusted life years DALYs DALY s BR 2007 CAO CAEP Final Report Assessing Current Scientific Knowledge Limited Environmental Noise a
225. ord 1929 January 10 Z24 3 1936 American Tentative Standards for Sound Level Meters For Measurement of Noise and Other Sounds J Acoust Soc Am 8 147 152 October 1936 Z24 2 1936 American Tentative Standards for Noise Measurement J Acoust Soc Am 8 143 146 October 1936 Z24 3 1944 American Standard Sound Level Meters for Measurement of Noise and Other 2 3 wm 4 Sounds American Standards Association Inc New York N Y 1944 July 28 IEC 123 1961 Recommendations for sound level meters Intended for general purpose survey 5 wm instruments frequency weightings were revised from those given in Z24 3 1944 IEC 179 1965 Precision sound level meters tighter tolerances than for survey meters IEC 179 1973 Revision of 1965 issue with tighter tolerance limits around design goals for frequency 6 7 weightings in the range from 10 Hz to 80 Hz IEC 651 1979 Sound level meters Consolidated revision of IEC 123 and IEC 179 for sound level meters measuring frequency weighted and time 8 weighted sound levels 9 IEC 804 1985 Integrating averaging sound level meters For sound level meters designed to measure time averaged sound levels and sound exposure levels 10 IEC 61672 1 2002 Electroacoustics meters Sound level Part 1 Specifications Alan Marsh
Download Pdf Manuals
Related Search